Stuart Craig, Harry Potter & Fantastic Beasts films' production designer, dies at 83 Malfoys, Dursleys, Hogwarts students, more cast in HBO 'Harry Potter TV series Tom Felton to reprise Draco Malfoy role in NYC 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' "Harry Potter" HBO MAX TV series casts Harry, Ron, and Hermione Harry Potter HBO/MAX TV series casts Dumbledore, Snape, McGonagall, Hagrid, more 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' announces 10 cities, part of North American tour Universal Orlando launching U.S. portal tour for Epic Unvierse attraction opening PUMA to release new Harry Potter and Hogwarts-House themed sportswear this month | |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| | Harry Potter News Fresh off the press! Stay informed on the latest Harry Potter news, updates, and whispers here. All News Rules and FAQs apply. | 
02-11-2008, 04:31 AM
| | | Deathly Hallows begins filming February 2009, length announcement coming soon Harry Potter films' producers David Heyman and David Barron were interviewed by Australia's The Daily Telegraph, where they talk about the fact that decisions are being made over whether or not the seventh book, Deathly Hallows, will be made into two films: Quote:
"We are still discussing it. The announcement will be made hopefully in the not-too-distant future, with regards to the way seven shapes up," Barron tells The Back Room.
The only negative of splitting the book into two films, says Barron, "is that people could possibly perceive it as being one last chance at cashing in. But the real positive, if we were to do that, would be that we wouldn't have quite the battle we always have of 'How do you compress all that book into just over two hours of screen time?'
"It would be brilliant not to have to cut anything.
"But at the same time, we have to think it through properly. We'd have to be very certain that there were two proper, stand-alone films that could be generated from the source material."
David Heyman states that a few directors have been considered to direct the Deathly Hallows film(s) and that as shooting will not commence until February 2009 (a year from now), nothing has been finalised at the present moment. |
02-11-2008, 04:39 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Grindylow
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 14,231
| The FORK. Be afraid.
Whoa, no way.
I can't believe they're seriously considering this.
I think it would be great to do the book justice, and theres really nothing you can cut from DH, everything is used to tie up the ending.
Theres just the problem of:
Where to end the first movie of DH,
What to name them both,
and
When to release them.
I'm all for it if thats the only way they can do DH justice.
|
| |
02-11-2008, 04:46 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| Moonlight Dueler Billywig
Join Date: May 2007 Location: California
Posts: 3,193
Hogwarts RPG Name: Hayden Lynette Thomas |
The naming part is easy. And if you listen to MuggleCast they came up with a good cliffhanger moment to leave off with (the point where they are just a bout to go into the Malfoy Manor). And yes when to release them will be tricky. It would be like Matrix Reloaded and Revolution coming out months within each other.
But what I think should happen is that they make a four hour movie with an intermission. Drive-thru movies were like this. Where you can watch two separate movies but in between was a short break for folks to get out their cars and shake their legs off and get some more treats.
__________________ |
| |
02-11-2008, 04:53 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Grindylow
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: MN, USA
Posts: 14,231
| The FORK. Be afraid. Quote:
Originally Posted by Antwone Thomas The naming part is easy. And if you listen to MuggleCast they came up with a good cliffhanger moment to leave off with (the point where they are just a bout to go into the Malfoy Manor).And yes when to release them will be tricky. It would be like Matrix Reloaded and Revolution coming out months within each other.
But what I think should happen is that they make a four hour movie with an intermission. Drive-thru movies were like this. Where you can watch two separate movies but in between was a short break for folks to get out their cars and shake their legs off and get some more treats. Well I think the point where Ron leaves would be a good place to leave off, too.
I think beginning with the conflict in Malfoy Manor would be too intense for the second movie. Beginning with Hermione getting tortured is a sure way to jump start the second movie. Theres really not a good place to put a divide line in though. Maybe after Dobby is killed. Either when Ron leaves or when Dobby dies.
Lol, "Previously, on Harry Potter..."
When was the last movie that had an Intermission? Did Titanic have one?
But then that gets ungodly long for one movie.
|
| |
02-11-2008, 05:30 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Snidget
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,659
Hogwarts RPG Name: Elizabeth Snape Graduated |
wow i cant believe they are actually considering this
__________________ Half Blood Prince |
| |
02-11-2008, 06:00 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Puffskein
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Kent
Posts: 1,284
Hogwarts RPG Name: unsorted | Emma Enthusiast Quote:
Originally Posted by reddiej Harry Potter films' producers David Heyman and David Barron were interviewed by Australia's The Daily Telegraph, where they talk about the fact that decisions are being made over whether or not the seventh book, Deathly Hallows, will be made into two films:
David Heyman states that a few directors have been considered to direct the Deathly Hallows film(s), and that as filming for the film(s) will not commence until February 2009 (a year from now), nothing has been finalised at the present moment, but that a statement about it "will be announced in the not-too-distant future."
tht makes me wayyyy so excited now for DH. they had better make it 2 hrs. we fans r truly clamouring for a good 6 hr 2 movies!also,it makes profit sense too...2 movies/double earnings....pls consider this,Heyman and Kloves and would b director!
__________________
Emma  Watson
|
| |
02-11-2008, 06:04 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Kelpie
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: BUE - Left Coast
Posts: 26,240
| Big Tuna | Booger | Team Men | Chris's SS!BFAM | Jules says I'm RAD | #Superman | Dustbin Instead of doing two films, why don't they just make it one long one? I've seen 6 hour movies before. *shrugs* |
| |
02-11-2008, 06:58 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| Keeper of the G/H snog Puffskein
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 2,447
| Quote:
I've seen 6 hour movies before.
WOW!!! The long movie I have seen was lotr 3 and I couldn't but shifting in my seat at the theatre every minute. I think if they split it, it would be like Matrix.
__________________ |
| |
02-11-2008, 07:10 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Chizpurfle
Join Date: May 2006 Location: In a world with Dan
Posts: 10,764
Hogwarts RPG Name: Lilly Young Second Year | Keeper of Harry's Smile Guard of Dan’s Curiosity
i like the idea of a two moive thing. that way nothing get cut out. cause about 98 percent of DH is import and shouldn't be cut out.
__________________ *Keeper of Ginny's Heart for Harry**Keeper of Emma's Sisterly Love For Dan**Dreams Can Come True*  *Siggy By Nat**Avvy By Jen*Dan is my Mr. Darcy* |
| |
02-11-2008, 08:37 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Crup
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 17,077
Hogwarts RPG Name: Marcella Riddle Graduated | Kaplinski Rival Sorting Hat Machine
I think it would be a really bad decision all round and I hope they choose to stick to one film.
|
| |
02-11-2008, 10:53 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Jobberknoll
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,126
|
DH movie should contain all the important scenes that happen in the book and I dont really care if it becomes a bit long but it should not be divided into two. It would really take the patience out of most people especially when they'll have to wait for some more time.
|
| |
02-11-2008, 02:15 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Mooncalf
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Norwich, UK [GMT]
Posts: 6,782
| So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.
Hmmm I don't see why they don't keep it as just one film... Surely it's meant to appeal to Harry potter fans, and Harry Potter fans would sit through it. I mean, lotr3 was 3 hours 15 minutes and people sat through that. They just need to be bold about it and keep in mind that they have a very difficult audience in the HP fans to please, so they need to make the decision that's best for the film
__________________ ✩ Sometimes, you just have to go with a classic ✩ 
✩__v__i__n__t__a__g__e__✩ |
| |
02-11-2008, 02:33 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Romanian Longhorn
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Neverland
Posts: 39,693
Hogwarts RPG Name: Margaret Jacqueline Atkinson Morris Fifth Year | Potter’s Princess A+ FangGirl
I'd rather if they had two films because, considering the previous ones, they'll cut too much from the plot, 3 hours long or not. Still, they'll have to choose the best part where to end the first and where to start the second or they'll ruin it.
__________________ I gotta go back to the muggle world,
they're gonna try and tell me this wasn't, that none of this happened,
but you know what? It was real. It did happen.
We spent time here. We made friends here. That's a part of us.
Cause Hogwarts is bigger than any of us, of any of it's founders,
and it's going to be around long after we're gone.
Maybe we'll see our kids come here one day.
That's the thing about Hogwarts.
No matter how long you're away from it, there's always a way back. |
| |
02-11-2008, 03:41 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Puffskein
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,438
| There're movies longer than like, 4 hours (like Cleopatra from the 60s with Elizabeth Taylor) - they could put them together in one but have an intermission of like, 15 minutes or so. Like the good old days of early movies apparently 
But yeah, that would be great actually, having NOTHING cut. They should've done that with many of the other movies (or at least not changed a lot around), but whatever. Either way it'll be awesome if they cut nothing from DH because that'd make up for every other cut and change from the other movies And it's not a book you can cut or change very easily anyways...
But that's awesome that they're trying so far
__________________  Siggy from Lissy and Anna's Shop of Super Frazzling Graphics |
| |
02-11-2008, 03:52 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Red Cap
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 83
Hogwarts RPG Name: Dan First |
i hope they're gonna release both of them at the same time 'cause if they don't it's gonna be worse for them. i think it's worse if u watch the first movie and the second comes out one year later it will be awfull
__________________ |
| |
02-11-2008, 04:32 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|  SS Featured Author Snidget
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Burrow
Posts: 2,923
| Fan Fic Queen Quote:
Originally Posted by lotrfrk11 Well I think the point where Ron leaves would be a good place to leave off, too.
I think beginning with the conflict in Malfoy Manor would be too intense for the second movie. Beginning with Hermione getting tortured is a sure way to jump start the second movie. Theres really not a good place to put a divide line in though. Maybe after Dobby is killed. Either when Ron leaves or when Dobby dies.
Lol, "Previously, on Harry Potter..."
When was the last movie that had an Intermission? Did Titanic have one?
But then that gets ungodly long for one movie. You took the words right out of my mouth. Ron leaving is the PERFECT place to leave off! I love MuggleCast, but I disagree with their idea. Plus, Ron's departure is basically in the exact middle of the book as well. It would be great.
I think that you're right in saying that Malfoy Manor would be too intense to start the film. If they should go through Malfoy Manor, you're right...End with Dobby's death.
And, once again, you read my mind. I think there should be an Intermission. I think it might be too long for some younger kids, but would it be appropriate for younger audiences anyway? It's HP...people would go and stay. Plus, concessions is where the movie theatres make their money. An intermission would be perfect for them. I'd prefer an intermission.
But if they need to do two films to do the book justice, I won't complain. I'm so glad David Heyman and David Barron are true fans. He actually uttered the words: Quote:
"But the real positive, if we were to do that, would be that we wouldn't have quite the battle we always have of 'How do you compress all that book into just over two hours of screen time?'
"It would be brilliant not to have to cut anything."
I really, really hope they stick to that...DON'T CUT ANYTHING!
Shannon
__________________ |
| |
02-11-2008, 05:46 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Lobalug
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posts: 183
Hogwarts RPG Name: Lionella Hastings |
I wish they did two films of it! I want to see EVERYTHING in the book on-screen! It would be great!
But if they did two film of it, what would they call them?
"Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 1" and "2"?
__________________
A fable is a story teaching the reader someting.
|
| |
02-11-2008, 10:16 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Plimpy
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: In the TARDIS
Posts: 15,341
| I don't want them to have to cut anything, but I really can't stand long films so hopefully it will be cut into 2.. |
| |
02-11-2008, 11:07 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Veela
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In a fairytale
Posts: 37,061
Hogwarts RPG Name: Jillian McGuffin Sixth Year | Gryffindor Goddess I'm actually one of those few people who don't mind longer films! I really don't want a two-part DH...I mean, what are they going to call it?
I wonder what Jo thinks about this idea... |
| |
02-12-2008, 02:06 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| Pepper Pirate Fang & Fluffy's Dogwalker Gnome
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Granny's house.
Posts: 293
Hogwarts RPG Name: Arabella Redstone |
Oh, that'll be interesting how they decide this. There's definatley pros and cons to this, and either way, fans might be a little disappointed. Either they cut out parts, or make the fans wait longer.
__________________ From the Purple Ladybug to the Green Pepper 
Happy Seventeen! Thanks Marie!! <3 |
| |
02-12-2008, 02:09 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
| | Mackled Malaclaw
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Maryland
Posts: 11,247
| Book Club Babe
I'm waiting for the anoucment for conformation
|
| |
02-12-2008, 03:10 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Jarvey
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Texas
Posts: 671
| Arteest Extraordinaire
TWO FILMS DO IT NOW.
how can you even think otherwise? I mean, look at Lord of the Rings!! they did it. I think they should end the first movie like..... right after ron comes back, then pick it back up the next movie where they get caught and go to the malfoys! merrrr JUST DO IT
|
| |
02-12-2008, 11:03 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|  DMT Jarvey
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Colorado
Posts: 543
Hogwarts RPG Name: Rilen Taylie Green Fifth Year | I would rather see it seperated into two movies released a few months apart. One long movie sounds good at first but could you imagine standing in line to go potty with 200+ other people and getting back to the theatre within 15 minutes so that you don't miss anything. Or having to wait 6 hours to go potty. Also imagine arriving at the theatre at 7 pm for the movie and leaving it at around 1 am.
__________________ |
| |
02-17-2008, 07:30 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Puffskein
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Edward's volvo <3
Posts: 1,800
Hogwarts RPG Name: Evelynn Mae White Sixth Year |
I don't mind if they split it in two parts, but it would have to be split in a nice spot, or it would be strange.
I like long films, but one DH would probably be too long anyway, at least for the theatres.
|
| |
02-17-2008, 07:36 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Flobberworm
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: somewhere
Posts: 12
Hogwarts RPG Name: brad potter Fifth | |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 PM. |