he was naked in the train station after he died but i dont think they are talkin about that part

This will be my favourite scene, it was in the book I can't wait to see H/Hr kiss

Think they are go a bit to far!

I don't like this. Harry should be naked for the kings cross, not this. WTF?

And this is supposed to be all about ron. Probably his most important scene, and the big deal will be Dan naked. -___- It's nothing special people geez.

I hope Rupert can act very brilliantly.. Well..I know he can..

I do remember the part where he was naked in the book, but it was near the end where it seemed like he had died, where he was with Dumbledore. I don't remember anything about him and Hermione kissing at all. I really hope they don't go too far with this, as it could really tarnish the whole series in peoples' minds.

That's weird, this scene isn't in the book!

The only time Harry's naked is when he's in King's cross with Dumbledore!

Not Necessary at all at that moment!

O: What they won't do to get someone to see a movie.
T: Write a good film.
O: Well there is that ... but couldn't they have given us Ron naked? I mean Rupert's cute too, oh heck throw in McLaggan c'mon ... at this point who cares about canon ... we've got to compete with New Moon
T: Question. If they wanted something sensual for Ron to react too, then why is it Dan that's naked?
O: Good one Shaggy.

I thought Harry was in his birthday suit when he "died" and went to King's Cross. He mentioned not having clothes, but also not really caring.

The H/Hr kiss was from when Ron tried to destroy the locket, am I correct?

Guh. Good thing I don't play quidditch here anymore. I've forgotten everything.

I’m glad they left this bit in as Ron’s leaving would seem a bit strange to someone who hadn’t read the books, it will show exactly what the lockets doing to them. There really isn’t any need for Harry to be naked though (not that I have a problem with it) but it feels like there just making him naked for the sake of it.

they r only gonna show him naked in that illusion of horcrux... i guess for the sensuality jazz... but that nudity will not affect the rating too much

O.K. That's fine.
CAN'T WAIT FOR DH.

I KNEW IT!!!!!!

I read it in a dutch newspaper a couple of weeks ago and immediatly posted it in one of my comments back then.....
However, in the 'Silver Doe' chapter Harry takes his clothes of, but kissing Hermione? yes, when the medaillion is open and Harry-Riddle and Hermione-Riddle came out to treat Ron and then they are kissing, but naked, no, I don't remember reading that in that chapter.....

It's a little strange that they're putting a nude Dan into DH. I don't particularly like it. I'm sure that you won't be able to see below the waist since loads of young kids are going to see the movie, but then why do they even have to bother having him nude or announcing it to us? Oh wait, I know, publicity.

James is sweet. I'm glad he's learned a lot.

"and one shows Hermione and Harry embracing and kissing,”

uh eeewww...jk rowling okay with that? i wonder what kind of kiss of that...friendly way? on cheeks?

i love the christmas eve of harry hermione scene on the book...arms with each other though...it was kinda sad for both of them without ron and without their family hunting horcrux instead of enjoying themselves....

i hope there will be scenes showing other than harry...you know i like to see some ginny, neville and luna at hogwarts while harry's looking for horcruxes...not all harry.. like snape and draco's mother with bellatrix on HBP

I only hope they keep the naked scene that's near the end of the movie. And who's complaining!? He's fit! And I'm sure it will please all the fangirls who missed the chance to see him naked in Equus.

Harry-Riddle and Hermione-Riddle's state of dress or undress is not mentioned. Besides, they're not going to be showing anything that can't be shown in a PG-13 rated movie. And, if I were Ron, I'd be more anguished over seeing a bare Harry-Riddle embracing and kissing Hermione-Riddle than I would a fully clothed one.

WHUT! Don't do it Yates!

hmmm They never saw their naked

I actually find this kind of funny, and awkward. like everyone has been saying, we all know when he is actually supposed to be naked.. but for this scene? i dont mind but its definitly not what i pictured, we'll only see him as half naked but i feels it might send the wrong message to some people lol, its not like hermione will be half naked so really why does he need to be? lol

I can understand part of the uproar, but for people to come out NOW and complain about things not in the books being added to the films after so many unneccesary and unwarranted additions to th films (burning Burrow, anyone?) it's a bit too late. These stopped being "children's" books once Goblet of Fire came out, with the death of a fellow student. The audience has grown with the films. I see no problem whatsoever with the scene being mentioned. It FITS in the context of the book. It ENHANCES what is written in the book, it doesn't detract from it like a lot of other stupid additions have done. (Cheesy talking severed heads and Harry and Ginny's "Oops my lips might have hit yours for a fraction of a second", anyone?). And it's not being done for sensationalist purposes. I say bravo to the filmmakers, to JKR and to Daniel for going with it.

I remember that part! After Ron saves him and cuts the Horcrux off of him, thats when he's naked. He's jumps in the water with no clothes on, then when Ron tries to kill the Horcrux it starts to show him images of Hermione and Harry kissing. I don't remember Harry being naked in the Horcrux image though! lol

Woah! Woah! WOAH!

This is going to be really good!

I never even dreamed that they actually were going to do the scene with Dan naked!

I think he was naked definitely at the King's Cross scene.....I can't remember him naked when the visions appeared frm the horcrux....hmmm