Students: 9872
Classes: 15
Professors: 12
| |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| |
01-26-2010, 08:07 PM
| | |  Rumor: Deathly Hallows in 3D?
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 and Part 2 will be converted to 3D. Quote:
Conversion expenses have been coming down, so each film will cost just $5 million to convert into 3D.
Warners also will absorb an additional $5 million expense per pic to pay for 3D glasses for exhibitors handling the movies.
Please note that this has NOT been confirmed by Warner Bros., although the publication believes that an official statement will be made soon. | |
01-27-2010, 02:36 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
| | Flobberworm
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
Do really like the sound of this. 3D films never really look very 3D.
| 
|  | |
01-27-2010, 03:16 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
| | Puffskein
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,139
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Gabriela Jean Gier
Seventh Year Magical Games & Sports |
WOW,great!
| |
| | |
01-27-2010, 03:20 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
| | Doxy
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Florida
Posts: 6,438
| My Cherie Amour
I dislike 3D! They want u to recycle them...and then recharge u for them!
__________________ Cherie  | |
| | |
01-27-2010, 04:00 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
| | Jarvey
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 623
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Grace Bennet
First Year |
I think the Harry Potter films shouldn't be in 3D.
I like the normal 2D films.
And we don't have any Imax.
Maybe the Hogwarts battle would be good in 3D but for me it doesn't have to be.
__________________  | |
| | |
01-27-2010, 04:53 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
| | Doxy
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Florida
Posts: 6,438
| My Cherie Amour
the rest of the films were not in 3D...why start now at the bitter end?
__________________ Cherie | |
| | |
01-27-2010, 05:19 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
| | Puffskein
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Serbia
Posts: 1,958
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Mark Smith
Fourth Year |
I think this is great!Battle will be awesome.Oh,I can't wait to see the movie...
| |
| | |
01-27-2010, 05:52 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
| | Ramora
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: GMT -5
Posts: 5,628
Ministry RPG Name:
Laura Miller
Environmental Protection | Pet, Nuzzle, Bite. Mherrfph. | Paris, Roma, Home Again | Possible Lovegood
Not a bad idea. Personally, I'll be headed to the 2D movie. Unfortunately, 3D gives me headaches 
__________________  | |
| | |
01-27-2010, 06:30 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
| | Murtlap
Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Latina, Italy
Posts: 65
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Merylo McGonagall
| Minerva Fan!
I hate watching films in 3D. I always get terrible headaches.
God, hope not.
| |
| | |
01-27-2010, 06:38 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
| | Horklump
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 42
|
no thanks ;/ i don't like that like every movie comes in 3D :s i would be maybe cool if they have the 3D like in Avatar because not very much things were "coming out" of the screen you know? i think that would be a little bit lame for Harry Potter if like the wands or the spells would "come out" of the screen. But we will just have to wait 8]  | |
| | |
01-27-2010, 11:18 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
| | Ashwinder
Join Date: May 2004 Location: USA
Posts: 13,555
| Ultimate Potterite Original original
Ew, I hope not. I'm not a fan of 3D in movies unless it's an IMAX special of the rain forest or Galapagos or something of that like.
| |
| | |
01-27-2010, 11:47 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
| | Jarvey
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: wizarding world
Posts: 636
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Annabelle Lythia Riley
First Year | lovin' life Gryffindor at ♥
OMG THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!!!  hope it gets confirmed ;D | |
| | |
01-28-2010, 02:05 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
| | Crup
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 17,077
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated | Kaplinski Rival Sorting Hat Machine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave9494  Does this mean (if it is confirmed) that we can watch it in 3D in regular theaters as well? Or just in Imax theaters? Cinemas do need to have 3D techology but there are plenty that do and aren't IMAX. Quote:
Wasn't the 5th HP in 3d?
Not entirely, no. Quote:
I hope they don't include the red-and-blue glasses; they make everything look tinted.
3D glasses are black now, aren't they? At least they have been at cinemas I've gone to...
I think 3D would work better for part II, given that the first has been described as a 'road movie'.
| |
| | |
03-29-2010, 04:55 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Woking, UK
Posts: 4
|
Note that Avatar was created in 3D using 3D cameras and 3D CGI techniques.
The method proposed here and used in many of the current crop of 3D films is using a conversion technique to convert a 2D film to 3D (though the 2D film may have scenes deliberately shot in a style that best suits the 3D conversion process).
The result will not be like Avatar and to get good effect they may have to resort to "in your face" shots. It's a cheap gimmick basically.
Oh, and at home, unless you buy one of the new 3D HDTVs that are coming out (very expensive), you will be using the old red/blue(or green) glasses as used in the 50s which is nauseating and limits the colour depth and resolution. It's a compromise. True 3D TVs work as in the current 3D cinemas, using polarised display and glasses.
Leave them alone I say, or shoot properly in 3D. But as the rest of the series was not shot in 3D it seems pointless.
| |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
| | | All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM. |
.jpg)
