sitemap
FOLLOW SNITCHSEEKER:

Email Us!

Members

There are 3733 users online including...
Marcozoria , RussellFrips , BrisaHep , Leroylendy , Carlosvog , JayAllop , TimothyPleve , Henrynic

8 members
3725 guests.

Members in Chat:



If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   SnitchSeeker.com > Forums > Daily Prophet (News) > Harry Potter News


Harry Potter News Fresh off the press! Stay informed on the latest Harry Potter news, updates, and whispers here. All News Rules and FAQs apply.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 04-07-2004, 02:26 PM
Hermione Hermione is offline
 
Default

* Save The Dursleys! - The Dursleys are cut from film four

Summary:
The film of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire looks like it will be a Dursley-free zone, with none of Harry's family featuring in the fourth movie.
Actor Richard Griffiths' agent told Newsround Online that Richard was "very disappointed" not to be appearing as Uncle Vernon in the film.

Article:

The film of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire looks like it will be a Dursley-free zone, with none of Harry's family featuring in the fourth movie.
Actor Richard Griffiths' agent told Newsround Online that Richard was "very disappointed" not to be appearing as Uncle Vernon in the film.

Griffiths also told a newspaper that he was hoping for a fans' revolt.

He said he'd even asked JK Rowling to try and get his character re-instated, but the fourth book is very long.

Griffiths is reported as saying "I said to JK Rowling: "Couldn't the Dursleys turn up to an open day at Harry's school or something,' but she said, 'I don't think so'."

The book of The Goblet of Fire is so long that there as no way that the filmmakers could fit everything into the movie.

It now looks as if the action will start at The Burrow or the Quidditch World Cup.

Although he says he won't be in this film, Richard Griffith says he's hoping to be back for Order of the Phoenix.

--------------
Ananova are also reporting the same thing.

Quote:
Griffiths told a British tabloid: "Filming had already started on the fourth and Fiona and I asked the producers 'Are we in it?' and they said: 'Oh, did no one tell you?'
--------------

I have made a petition to try and get him back in. Please sign! http://www.petitiononline.com/dursley/petition.html

CBBC Newsround
Old 04-08-2004, 01:00 AM   #26 (permalink)
Hufflepuff
Imp
 
cho_changseeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Um...Uh-Can I get back to you on that?
Posts: 417
Default

oh no!! that is so totally cruel!
cho_changseeker is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 02:57 AM   #27 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Gnome
 
mione_grint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Caracas Venezuela Latinamerica
Posts: 293
Default

Ok I hate the Dursley I really do but I want them in the movies!! It won't be the same without them!!!!! I never thought I would say this but... SAVE THE DURSLEY!
__________________
Naita88.tumblr.com
mione_grint is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 03:00 AM   #28 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Snidget
 
bubbles01002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In a box, it's quite nice actually...
Posts: 2,787
Default

Aww...thats sad...
__________________
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt....

Then its HILARIOUS!


Lily Anderson

bubbles01002 is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 03:09 AM   #29 (permalink)
Dark Force Defense League
Gryffindor
Flamingo
t3h EJ
Filipino for Life!
Clabbert
 
Edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 19,179
Default

Wow! That's sad... but what can we do...
If they REALLY have to cut them off, so be it...
I think it'll be a complete nonsense if they opened it with the Riddle House, and then Harry would wake up with a tingling scar in the Burrow... O_o
But... anyways... I think I might sign...
Thanks for the info, anyhow! :sorcerer:
__________________
*
Hello sweetie. <3
Edge is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 06:14 AM   #30 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Imp
 
AccioSnuffles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 491
Default

I actually had to think if the dursley's were even in book four. Now that i was reminded of the tounge taffy, maybe they might keep that scene but play it on someone else like malfoy. I am not going to cry over the dursley's being out, it is better than cutting out something like neville's boggart. If JKR is ok with it, so am I.
__________________
I am not worried, Harry, I am with you -Dumbledore

AccioSnuffles is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 06:21 AM   #31 (permalink)
Retired Site Elf
Kappa
 
Rovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 13,202
Default
Jr. Lord of Arda

They what? OMG NO!!

SO how are they going to start? OMG they have to have the frank scene...and the Dursley's have to be in the movie! Harry HAS to go to privet drive every year...it's an important part of the story! OMG!
__________________
“After all this time?”
“Always.”
Rovie is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 06:35 AM   #32 (permalink)
Hufflepuff
Luffs Lickin' Elbows
Puffskein
 
HPgurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Off in my own world, listening to Hedley or the Weekend.
Posts: 1,511
Default

I signed!!!
I was the 203rd signature, so there is getting to be lots now!!
__________________

Ghost Signature brought to you by Amber

Maybe there'll be no more pain,

the day we all go insane.

HPgurl is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 06:37 AM   #33 (permalink)
Members
Bundimun
 
Book <3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 20
Default

Muggle Humor has also posted a petition. Being that it is Muggle Humor, they support muggles, and the scene of the Weasleys blowing up their living room is humorous. I'm sorry, but the scene adds light to the dark events that take place in the book. This scene must be included.
Book <3 is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 06:43 AM   #34 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Puffskein
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,368
Default

O well.
that ok .
vietgirlz_8706 is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 07:25 AM   #35 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Streeler
 
sparklyjazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 200
Default

The Dursley are really wretched, but they still deserve their part in the movie. What the movie studio should do is make the movie into two films. They would make more money and it would give us all something to look forward to until the next two books come onto shelves. I'll sign the petition too. Maybe it'll help!
__________________
Ravenclaw Represent.
sparklyjazz is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 07:45 AM   #36 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Imp
 
O.WoodChicGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Out of my mind back in 5 minutes. Maybe.
Posts: 418

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Azzariah
Graduated
Default

I want the Dursley's in it too how else will the non- readers know the joy Harry feels when he gets to leave their house every year. Though JK had to of given the go on this it is her book and wouldn't she know what would work best though not sure what she is thinking especially cutting them out maybe all the $$ going to her head. I hope not. :unsure: :ermsmile: :/
__________________
In loving memory 7/26/35-6/7/04
love you Daddy
O.WoodChicGH is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 07:09 PM   #37 (permalink)
Members
Dugbog
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 101
Default

Man, that sucks. I wish they would stick to the ook more. Even if the movie would be too long. They should juust make it be two movies.
potters_grl626 is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 07:14 PM   #38 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Fire Slug
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Actor Richard Griffiths' agent told Newsround Online that Richard was "very disappointed" not to be appearing as Uncle Vernon in the film.
Awww, thats so sad! He sounds like he was really hoping to be in the next movie, Im defidently signing!!
glowing_elf is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 07:42 PM   #39 (permalink)
lilbunnyfoofoo13
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

don't anybody go and see the 4th movie it is as simple as that. they will lose tons of money from their idiotic decision!
 
Old 04-09-2004, 04:57 AM   #40 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Imp
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kannnsasssss
Posts: 403
Default

oh my gosh. Not trying to be rude or anything but you people are being very dramatic about them cutting a scene. I am not going to sign the petition because do you really think that this petition is going to make a difference. As for how they are going to start the movie I have faith in them thats why they are the movie watchers and we are the fans. I just think that you need to get over it and move on because when they make there mind up they are not changing it.
rongranger is offline  
Old 04-09-2004, 05:26 AM   #41 (permalink)
Fleur*Delacour
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree that they should show the Dursleys in the movie, but all y'all are being just a wee bit dramatic!
 
Old 04-09-2004, 08:16 AM   #42 (permalink)
Mafalda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am a bit disappointed in this, I was looking forward to seeing Arthur blasting the Dursley’s living room *Sigh* I will miss the order of the movie, Dursleys, Train, School, trouble!

I will not sign anything, those people at WB never listen *Spite!*
 
Old 04-10-2004, 04:56 AM   #43 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Puffskein
 
fleurdelacour17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Godric's Hollow
Posts: 1,075
Default

i think that them cutting the dursleys is really not a big deal because at the beginning of the goblet of fire, its not very important to the story for them to be in it because it was such a tiny scene. But I do think that they will be back for the order of the phoenix b/c the dementors at the dursley's is an important chunk of the story and no way jk can cut that out. I mean, there is no point in signing a petition when jk said herself that that scene is not realavent, and why would someone override her? she WROTE the books. :sorcerer:
__________________
JKR: Well I think anyone who is still shipping Harry/Hermione after this book -
ES: [whispered] Delusional!
JKR: Uh - no! But they need to go back and reread, I think.
ES: Thank you.
JKR: Yeah.
fleurdelacour17 is offline  
Old 04-10-2004, 05:00 AM   #44 (permalink)
Dark Force Defense League
Doxy
 
Shacklebolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,400
Default

Simply put, I don't think it can work. They need to have the ton-tongue toffee part. They can't just start at the QWC. They're essential!

Oh well. Not much I can do but sign the petition.
Shacklebolt is offline  
Old 04-10-2004, 01:00 PM   #45 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Mooncalf
 
*Snivellus*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,729
Default

Signed!...but IM not sure they will listen...But I hope they will :unsure:
*Snivellus* is offline  
Old 04-11-2004, 01:23 AM   #46 (permalink)
Hufflepuff
Puffskein
 
Emmaline_Vance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: 9, Diagon Alley
Posts: 1,258
Default

as long as JK's ok with the cut, i don't think it'll have a big influence. and by cutting the Dursleys, they might have enough time for the 3 tasks.
__________________
"It unscrews the other way" - Professor McGonagall
Emmaline_Vance is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:13 AM   #47 (permalink)
Dark Force Defense League

Mooncalf
 
nicole black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 'clever joke here'
Posts: 7,175

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Desdemona Minerva Evans #6082B6
Ravenclaw
Fifth Year

Hogwarts RPG Name:
TBD
Ravenclaw
First Year
x8
Default
you wanna fite? | 💚 nickleback 💚 | Uh, anyway.

if they take out the durleys ill be relly angrey :angry: at them
__________________

the moon:

feminine, intuitive, inner strength, innocence
nicole black is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:18 AM   #48 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Puffskein
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia (USA!)
Posts: 1,163
Default

NOO!! they can't cut the Dursleys! I wanted to see the whole scene of the Weasley's arriving in the fireplace and Dudley's tongue enlarging so bad!!!! I can't believe they aren't going to be in it!! *pouts*
Sђỡỡting٭Sŧα is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:35 AM   #49 (permalink)
Slytherin
Ramora
 
Dawn Bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,506
Default

AAaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh, they're so mean, but we NEED them, I'm signing, straight away!!!! Noooo, they can't do this!!! It'll RUIN EVERYTHING!!!!! It's NOT the SAME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dawn Bloom is offline  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:39 AM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
Billywig
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 9th level of Hell
Posts: 3,773
Default

we should sue. There like the funniest part.
Tidus16 is offline  
Closed Thread

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 PM.


This Harry Potter and Wizarding World fan website and community is not endorsed by Hogwarts, Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling, Warner Bros., Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Quidditch, Deathly Hallows, Sorcerer's Stone, Wizards, Muggles, No-Maj, MACUSA, Newt Scamander, Video Games, Half-Blood Prince, Orders of the Phoenix, Goblet of Fire, Philosopher's Stones, Chamber of Secret, Pottermore, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, Eddie Redmayne, Cursed Child, or any other official Harry Potter source.

All content is copyright ©2002 - 2026, SnitchSeeker.com unless stated otherwise. Privacy Policy

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Site designed by Richard Harris Design

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241