Students: 5850 Classes: 15 Professors: 14
Members in Chat: BertieBot, Gildebot_LockHart | |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| | Harry Potter News Latest news and rumors about the Harry Potter world! | Vote for SS! 
08-07-2007, 12:58 PM
| | | JK fails to ban an image of her son being published (UPDATED)
An image has been published in the Sunday Express showing JK Rowling pushing her son, David, in a buggy. The image was being used in an article to show her approach to motherhood, but JK Rowling tried to have it banned, as it was a breach of privacy. This attempt was unsuccessful. Quote:
Mr Justice Patten said: "I have considerable sympathy for the claimant's parents and anyone else who wishes to shield their children from intrusive media attention.
"But the law does not in my judgment (as it stands) allow them to carve out a press-free zone for their children in respect of absolutely everything they choose to do."
| Jo has been granted permission to appeal and in the meantime there is a temporary ban on publication of the image. Quote:
Mr Justice Patten pointed out that, before the 1998 Human Rights Act, the law did not recognise any such right at all, and there was still no general cause of action for "invasion of privacy".
"If the law is such as to give every adult or child a legitimate expectation of not being photographed without consent on any occasion on which they are not, so to speak, on public business, then it will have created a right for most people to the protection of their image," he said.
"If a simple walk down the street qualifies for protection, then it is difficult to see what would not."
For most people who were not public figures, there would be virtually no aspect of their lives which could not be said to be private.
The judge said the boundaries of what people could expect to remain confidential or private were inevitably influenced "by the fact that we live in an open society with a free press".
There was "an area of routine activity which, when conducted in a public place, carries no guarantee of privacy".
| Quote: |
The photo agency was awarded £40,000 interim costs against the Murrays pending the outcome of the appeal and a final costs assessment.
| UPDATE: The BBC has a quote from J.K.Rowling: Quote:
In a statement, Rowling said she and her husband Neil were "disappointed by the judgement, which seems to have misunderstood our claim".
"Our aim has only been to protect our children from press intrusion during their childhood.
"We see no legitimate reason why, as in this case, David, who was less than two years of age at the time, should have his photograph taken and then published in the press.
"We take his, and that of his siblings, privacy and safety very seriously."
| Jo also confirmed that she intends to appeal.
Last edited by EmmaRiddle : 08-07-2007 at 04:25 PM.
|
08-07-2007, 01:25 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Glumbumble
Location: cape town south africa Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 181
Hogwarts RPG Name: Preity Chan Hermione Potter Second | i hope that J.K can appeal this because it is kind of an infringement on her privacy and she might not want her son to be exposed to the public as yet and that is to be understandable |
| |
08-07-2007, 01:41 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| Faerie CircleTonks' Love for Lupin Hippogriff
Location: I hear voices in my head and you worry that you're a freak? Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,619
Hogwarts RPG Name: Tonksamelia (Tonks) for short. Third | That's so hard to do...keep your privacy after becoming so famous. I understand her wanting to keep her kids out of the public eye though, and I do wish her the best of luck. Hope she is moe successful with it than most celebrities seem to be ecspecially with the whole papparrazzi issue....and yah I know my spelling sucks right now. 
Good luck JK. |
| |
08-07-2007, 01:49 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| formerly: lovexhate  Chimaera
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,113
Hogwarts RPG Name: Anniebell Weasley First Year | I don't read this paper but all i can say is good luck to JK |
| |
08-07-2007, 01:52 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| K.O. of Mr Tennant's specs Banshee
Location: scotland, the counry Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,116
| The sunday mail printeed a picture of her sdon in his buggy when Dh came out and quite rightly jo complained...
She is famous not her son! |
| |
08-07-2007, 01:58 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Glumbumble
Location: cape town south africa Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 181
Hogwarts RPG Name: Preity Chan Hermione Potter Second | i totally agree with all of you guys, the paparazzi need to realize when the limit, when it comes to inoccent kids who's parents happen to be in the public eye |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:00 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| Tonks' Hairdresser Crup
Location: The U.S. of A. Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,089
Hogwarts RPG Name: Kim Granger Fourth Year Ministry RPG Name:
Sofia M. Mainella Magical Transportation | I wouldnt want my children in the public eye either
(if I ever have kids)
but any who.... Go Jo! |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:05 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| LL/ELFC Graphics Officer SOTS Staff Tonks' Pink Bunny Bicorn
Location: neverland. ;) Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,896
Hogwarts RPG Name: Lyn Molinero Second | Even though what the photographer did was legal, i still think its an invasion privacy, Jo has every right to be upset. |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:23 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| Hindi Language Mod TFFC Graphics Officer SOTS Staff Demiguise
Location: look behind you....b Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,381
Hogwarts RPG Name: Amelia Genevieve Laurent Fourth Ministry RPG Name:
Susan Mary Peters International Cooperation | Well, that's the price you have to pay if your famous, isn't it? I mean, it was completely wrong on the photographer's part but now that the damage is done.... |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:30 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| 9¾, WWW & Gallery Mod Spanish Language Mod GOFC sponsor Twilight insider Banshee
Location: In Edward's meadow Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,293
| Yeah, definitely an invasion of privacy.
Here, it's illegal to publish pictures of minors without the parents concent. I think it should be like that everywhere. They should leave the kids alone, they are the ones in the public eye. |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:34 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| K.O. DD's Watch KO Neville's Clumsiness Skrewt
Location: Enjoying summer Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,436
Hogwarts RPG Name: Emily Melissa Watson Sixth Year Ministry RPG Name:
Charles Cedrian Cizorsky Magical Transportation | Aww. Poor Jo. I hope she can get her appeal. |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:47 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Hinkypunk
Location: in the wonderful land of sweet things and love Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 890
Hogwarts RPG Name: Lilly Nymphadora Potter Second | this is totally rediculas, why should the shild be tormented in this manner hope that Jo gets to have those pics and any future pics of her kids banned from publication if it is to be published with out her concent.
the paparazzi should really learn to find their limit in the amount of snooping that they do |
| |
08-07-2007, 02:57 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| KA ModPadfoot's Pawprint Headz&Tailz<3 Phoenix
Location: watching Staceh. Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,858
Hogwarts RPG Name: Lindsey Vanessa Hamilton Sixth Year Ministry RPG Name:
Peter Philip Polechi Magical Games & Sports | I do have to point out, its not like her son is going to be targeted now
I wish her the best of luck though, every parent should try to help the safety and security of their child, including what others know of them around the world <3 |
| |
08-07-2007, 03:01 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| Teddy's Founder Tonks' Best FriendChic Chocolat Faerie
Location: Sig credit to Sirius' Lothlorien Paradise! Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,042
Hogwarts RPG Name: Seren [Ser/Rennie] Barker Third Ministry RPG Name:
Ry Taylor | If I had tried to publish that, I'd be ashamed of myself.
JK's family deserve privacy, and Ms Rowling had every right to sue and take them to court. I hope she wins her battle, because they have no right to put pictures of her family on the paper.
A new law should be added to the Human Rights Act - giving people the right to privacy, and not allowing pictures of them or their family to be shown by the media. Unless it is a convict, terrorist or something else, who deserve to be named and shamed.
After my rant, I'll just say this -
GO JK! |
| |
08-07-2007, 03:14 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| G1GGL3R! *giggles* Veela
Location: Stalking...-shifty- Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,072
Hogwarts RPG Name: Shayna Reagan Fourth Year | Aww, even though what they did was legal, Jo still has every right to her privacy. |
| |
08-07-2007, 03:21 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Kappa
Location: underground Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,027
Hogwarts RPG Name: Audrey Clark Second | bah. if you're that famous, it pretty much is part of the package. yeah, the paparazzi are out of line most of the time, but that's just how it is. |
| |
08-07-2007, 03:33 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Glumbumble
Location: DRESS REHERSAL!!!!!! Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 192
Hogwarts RPG Name: Clementine Reynolds Second Year | that stinks for JK Rowling |
| |
08-07-2007, 03:34 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Griffin
Location: in my little box Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,951
| People suck. They should leave kids out of it. |
| |
08-07-2007, 04:11 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| Tonks' Werewolf Crup
Location: Summerr come soonn<3 Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,242
Hogwarts RPG Name: Alana Colarossi Fourth | I think it was kind of rude for them to shoot a picture of Jo when we all know how private she likes to keep her family.
I honestly am on Jo's side the entire way. Although maybe it was a bit much to go and have the picture banned, i still think that if she wants her privacy, she is allowed to keep it.
Wow, £40,000 is a lot of money in canadian anyway! |
| |
08-07-2007, 04:29 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| Russian Mod HBCFC President SotS Writer Lethifold
Location: Box Three. Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21,050
Hogwarts RPG Name: Tancred L. Adara Seventh Year | It was kind of rude for them to do that, even if it is legal. They should at least show some respect and not publish it. |
| |
08-07-2007, 05:56 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
| Kaplinski Rival NOT Strange or Evil Inspirational Bugbear
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,150
Hogwarts RPG Name: Marcella Riddle Graduated | Quote: |
A new law should be added to the Human Rights Act - giving people the right to privacy, and not allowing pictures of them or their family to be shown by the media. Unless it is a convict, terrorist or something else, who deserve to be named and shamed.
| As the guy said, that isn't really practical. Convicts & terrorists are still humans, by the way. |
| |
08-07-2007, 07:11 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
| Filipino Language Mod DA President FDFC Co-Pressie Gryffindor Goddess Runespoor
Location: In a fairytale Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 31,058
Hogwarts RPG Name: Jillian McGuffin First Year | I think its unfair of the press to invade Jo and her children's privacy... |
| |
08-07-2007, 09:34 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| I mod Cauldrons 0_oMy Imi Kelpie
Location: =O I have a location Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 23,461
Hogwarts RPG Name: Emmett Crosston First Year | Thats really bad. I can't believe they'd do such a thing. |
| |
08-07-2007, 09:39 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Ramora
Location: Nebraska Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 374
Hogwarts RPG Name: unsorted | Poor Jo. |
| |
08-07-2007, 10:14 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Imp
Location: Portland, OR USA Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 101
Hogwarts RPG Name: Juanita Aispuro First | In My Opinion..... If you are famous then everybody is going to go snooping in your life.
So, either don't go out or go out and ignore the press. Sorry If I offend anybody but that's what I think.  |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 AM. |