SnitchSeeker.com

SnitchSeeker.com (https://www.snitchseeker.com/forum.php)
-   Harry Potter News (https://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/)
-   -   No Fleur Delacour in Deathly Hallows? (UPDATED) (https://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/no-fleur-delacour-in-deathly-hallows-updated-55903/)

katiebell 05-08-2008 05:05 PM

No Fleur Delacour in Deathly Hallows? (UPDATED)
 
Fashion e-zine WhoWhatWearDaily is reporting that Clemence Poesy (Fleur Delacaour) will not appear in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

Quote:

Sadly, Poesy has chosen to not reprise her role in the Potter pictures, so it’s unlikely we’ll see her on American red carpets in the very near future.
We are attempting to confirm this through Warner Bros. (see update below, at end of article)

In the meantime, we've uploaded several pictures of Poesy from a recent photoshoot in French magazine Blast, which you can view here in our galleries.

http://www.snitchseeker.com/gallery/...xed2hq7uc2.png

Thanks to gaspardulliel.net. for the Blast scans!

--------------------
UPDATE: UniversHarryPotter has been in contact with Poesy's agent and has confirmation that the actress was misquoted in the magazine and has never stated she doesn't want to be in future Potter films.

RiddleMeThis 05-08-2008 05:10 PM

Aww, shame....

Danny Boy 05-08-2008 05:12 PM

I wonder why
second post not to bad

expectopatronum 99 05-08-2008 05:14 PM

No Fleur, then no Bill & no wedding @ the burrow - ahh well it wasn't critical to the plot but would have been nice!

Tommehbell 05-08-2008 05:16 PM

:woot: 4th to post!

wow I mean the wedding is in the Deathly Hallows, that is an important scene in the book and it has to be in the movie, but they are plenty of French chicks out there that would love to be in a HP movie

this is critical to the plot, that horrible weasley aunt reveals to harry a lot of things about dumbledor.

masterofmystery 05-08-2008 05:16 PM

That's hardly a surprise, but I swear WB better not change it from Bill/Fleur to Remus/Tonks. Please don't, I might gag a little.

Nattie 05-08-2008 05:16 PM

I was really looking forward to the wedding scene and the havoc that is created. I wonder how they will change that, and also Shell cottage.

Shame, but I must admit she never was the Fleur I imagined

Hermione67 05-08-2008 05:17 PM

Wonder if there will be another actress to replace her.
Or would Bill and Fleur's wedding just be omitted from the movie

BABYFAYCETM 05-08-2008 05:26 PM

no wedding for him =/
cold feet ?

FoxFire 05-08-2008 05:30 PM

Well, to be specific, this doesn't say that the character of Fleur won't appear in DH; just that Clemence won't. They could very well recast her. And they had better. What's the point of doing a two-parter if you're still going to be omitting scenes?

purple·myst 05-08-2008 05:36 PM

NOOO!! I really wanted to see the wedding!!! I really hope this isnt true.

SnfflesLuvr 05-08-2008 05:42 PM

Somebody needs to play Fleur, atleast for the Shell Cottage scenes...

HP301 05-08-2008 05:44 PM

what?!
No Fleur??!!!
That's just stupid, she's so importent for some parts of the story line!

HarryThePotter 05-08-2008 05:56 PM

Thats so sad! I really liked Fleur in the Halfblood prince. And really, Clémence is so pretty!

Blackened 05-08-2008 05:58 PM

Well, shame she won't be in it, but I'm sure they can find a decent Fleur out there.

Patronus Charm 05-08-2008 06:07 PM

I am convinced a different actress will be Fleur. The wedding scene is crucial. Too much happens in that scene AND since the movie will be in two parts they wont have to delete as much out.

I wonder if warner bros and clemence simply did not come to an agreement.

Kazters 05-08-2008 06:39 PM

there must be a good reason for her to not want to do it!

Mrs Felton 05-08-2008 07:17 PM

I can't she'd just not want to do it. HP's got to be one of the biggest films ever. I hope they just recast her.

Antwone Thomas 05-08-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomasina Riddle (Post 6596667)
this is critical to the plot, that horrible weasley aunt reveals to harry a lot of things about dumbledor.

Right you are!

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxFire (Post 6596706)
Well, to be specific, this doesn't say that the character of Fleur won't appear in DH; just that Clemence won't. They could very well recast her. And they had better. What's the point of doing a two-parter if you're still going to be omitting scenes?

Right you are! Read closely people!! :)

Padie 05-08-2008 07:40 PM

I wonder what they're planning <_< *pokes WB*

Mrs_Molly_Weasley 05-08-2008 07:46 PM

Nu uh that isnt right! I LOVED the character Fleur! Omg!!!!

RemusBlack 05-08-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

That's hardly a surprise, but I swear WB better not change it from Bill/Fleur to Remus/Tonks.
EmmaRiddle told us that Remus and Tonks just appear together in HBP. |:
You can gag now.

--
This sucks.

Lissy Longbottom 05-08-2008 07:50 PM

She's chosen to not appear in any other films? Or they haven't asked her back? It seems strange that they would not include the wedding in DH...especially since they broke it into two parts. It's a pretty important part, I think.

Oh well, hopefully we can confirm this soon!

Deadmau5 05-08-2008 07:53 PM

No way! I demand Fleur is in it! Without Fleur, there is no Shell Cottage. Without Fleur, there is no Gringotts break in. Without Fleur, there is no Horcrux destroyed.

See how important she is?

Hermione-is-the-best 05-08-2008 08:30 PM

Why? It's a shame, she was really good

BreBear 05-08-2008 08:47 PM

:/ Whyyy? Maybe they'll get someone else to play it? Who knows.

Embem 05-08-2008 08:48 PM

Oh well, I'd already given up hope of a decent film. So I'm not that disappointed. I just think WB are idiots.

Ginny GL 05-08-2008 08:53 PM

I just hope they don't cut the character, since this time she's part of pivotal scenes. Well, she was also in HBP...

hpnaiv 05-08-2008 09:01 PM

NOOOOO ! << all i have to say.

Melted 4 HP 05-08-2008 09:01 PM

well FINE >:|

quickquotesquill 05-08-2008 09:09 PM

oh man that stinks! she made a good fleur

aliciahutchinson 05-08-2008 09:22 PM

Well that's not good to hear, but I hope that she does well in her future...

mollywobbles123 05-08-2008 10:02 PM

WHAT?! No Fleur!!! That totally sucks! I hope she decides to come back or they get another french girl as pretty as Clemence!
They HAVE to still do the wedding though. I've been looking forward to it
ever since the DH book came out!!!
I hope she still acts in other movies in her later career, she's such a great actress!

ladycplum 05-08-2008 10:04 PM

I wouldn't mind them recasting Fleur, Clemence is pretty, but she doesn't seem the type to turn men into mindless slugs by her mere appearance. THAT BEING SAID, if the wedding in and of itself is not included in the movie, upset, angry, insulted, revolted, crushed, gypped, and insanely homicidal will not even go near what I will feel. :mwaha:

Lonnie 05-08-2008 10:36 PM

No kidding? Didn't surprise me. Stupid really. Shes not my favorite character, but she does bring humour to the books and since DH is split into two movies... to stay truer to the books right? Why cut her out then? Maybe they'll find another actress? I dont think so, but... you never know

MalfoyzBeloved 05-08-2008 10:47 PM

:rotfl: They said they wouldn't take anything out of Deathly Hallows.
NOTHING.
If Fleur isn't there... that's a crucial part. If I recall correctly, at the wedding the Death Eaters came and that's why Harry, Ron, and Hermione ran in the first place. They can't leave that out because that'd be THE MEANEST BROKEN PROMISE EVER!

But yeah, I doubt they'll leave her out of this. If not Clemence, than someone else will be found no doubt :) I don't really like her as Fleur anyways... she was pretty enough but yeah.
Can't forget that; there is the possibility someone else will be Fleur in D.H! I kinda hope that'll happen in a way, but if Clemence doesn't come back than a new person will probably be coming.

Beth2310 05-08-2008 11:15 PM

thats bull crap!!!
now DH wont be the same!!

Lily Evans 05-08-2008 11:41 PM

What!!? So Bill and Fleur!! no and the wedding and the house!!....OK...I have to wait to see what i s going to happen

Rachel * 05-09-2008 12:04 AM

Dear Site Owner
 
Sorry but this is not true.

WhoWhatWearDaily is a fashion blog run by two ex magazine editors that comment about people's outfits. They did not interview her for that post so please don't believe it. Since the blog started they have never interviewed anyone exclusively for their site. It's just their thoughts about fashion.

In the April issue of Empire magazine there was an interview with Clémence and she said that while she is not in HBP she would come back for DH if asked.

I would believe a movie magazine interview over a fashion blog anyday. This shouldn't be on your news page as it's just made up gossip.

werewolfinlove 05-09-2008 12:30 AM

nooooooooo!!!!!!!!!! This is so bad! Gir!!!

ladycplum 05-09-2008 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rachel * (Post 6598681)
Sorry but this is not true.

WhoWhatWearDaily is a fashion blog run by two ex magazine editors that comment about people's outfits. They did not interview her for that post so please don't believe it. Since the blog started they have never interviewed anyone exclusively for their site. It's just their thoughts about fashion.

In the April issue of Empire magazine there was an interview with Clémence and she said that while she is not in HBP she would come back for DH if asked.

I would believe a movie magazine interview over a fashion blog anyday. This shouldn't be on your news page as it's just made up gossip.

I hereby instruct everyone to READ THIS POST FIRST before crying, precious. :gollum2:

Pigwidgeon Took 05-09-2008 02:01 AM

interesting, I liked Fleur as a character...

elmo_the_emo 05-09-2008 02:09 AM

nooooo it is important she is there.what will happen to teddy/victoire pairing?and the wedding?and the cottage?and lots more?but still what a shame

TheTravSter 05-09-2008 02:43 AM

I was looking forward to the whole bill/ fluer wedding.

Mrs_ronald_weasley 05-09-2008 04:38 AM

Ok they will have to find another Fleur! i men the wedding scene is one of my favorite parts in the book! (Ron asks Hermione to dance HELLO!!!) :) yeah... so they have to recast her... because I say so ... and that's final. *nods enthusiastically*

h/g ship lover 05-09-2008 05:05 AM

That's really sad! I liked her as Fleur! Fleur isn't that much important in the plot, but what anout shell cottage? And I would've loved to see the wedding. scene. But if she gets replaced by another actress, it would be a bit confusing for some people because they wouldn't know that it's the same character in GoF.

BreBear 05-09-2008 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rachel * (Post 6598681)
Sorry but this is not true.

WhoWhatWearDaily is a fashion blog run by two ex magazine editors that comment about people's outfits. They did not interview her for that post so please don't believe it. Since the blog started they have never interviewed anyone exclusively for their site. It's just their thoughts about fashion.

In the April issue of Empire magazine there was an interview with Clémence and she said that while she is not in HBP she would come back for DH if asked.

I would believe a movie magazine interview over a fashion blog anyday. This shouldn't be on your news page as it's just made up gossip.

Wether this is true or not, I know not, but I WOULD believe a movie mag. over a fashion mag. anyday. However, I do believe that this should be understood:

JUST BECAUSE CLEMENCE DOESN'T PLAY THE CHARACTER DOESN'T MEAN IT WON'T BE RECASTED.

imo, Clemence wasn't right for the role. She isn't ditzy enough; she is gorgeous, but not in a veela, transfixing way.

just my opinion.

ron's_girl 05-09-2008 05:39 AM

WHAT???????? this is like my deathly hallows nightmare...why not...she should come back...so what about the wedding..i really want to see hermione and ron in action...why? that would have been a light scene within this dark movie...

half_blood_prince 05-09-2008 05:43 AM

i hope its not true, i hope she is in dh

RadcliffeWatson 05-09-2008 06:44 AM

She looks really pretty in the magazine spread!! :) Its a shame that she isn't reprising her role!!

Riddikulus! 05-09-2008 08:55 AM

excited for sorting....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxFire (Post 6596706)
Well, to be specific, this doesn't say that the character of Fleur won't appear in DH; just that Clemence won't. They could very well recast her. And they had better. What's the point of doing a two-parter if you're still going to be omitting scenes?

I couldn't have said it better myself.

Ginevra 05-09-2008 09:18 AM

I hope that they get someone else to play Fleur. Clemence was really good as her. They've got to have Fleur in DH. She (and Bill of course) were important to the story.

Hermionespell 05-09-2008 10:29 AM

It's too bad that she's not going to be in the movie. It's definitely understandable though.

Ginpotter 05-09-2008 10:30 AM

What??? and Why?? there are two possibilities, There will be no Fleur in DH and that means no Wedding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and the other one that they will replace her with another actress and I can't see why??

EmmaRiddle 05-09-2008 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxFire (Post 6596706)
Well, to be specific, this doesn't say that the character of Fleur won't appear in DH; just that Clemence won't. They could very well recast her. And they had better. What's the point of doing a two-parter if you're still going to be omitting scenes?

Doing 2 films doesn't mean they're going to lift the plot from the books, word for word (which is a good thing imo).

I think we've seen this coming for a long time - ever since she & Bill were ommitted from Half-Blood Prince. I think it will be Lupin/Tonks getting married.

Quote:

Without Fleur, there is no Shell Cottage. Without Fleur, there is no Gringotts break in. Without Fleur, there is no Horcrux destroyed.

See how important she is?
Her place can easily be substituted by Tonks. It's not necessary that it's Fleur. Her purpose can be served by someone else.

Quote:

DH is split into two movies... to stay truer to the books right? Why cut her out then?
Being faithful and literal aren't the same thing. As it stands, the film audience won't have much knowledge of Bill & Fleur as a couple, so it makes sense to leave them out or replace them.

Quote:

They said they wouldn't take anything out of Deathly Hallows.
No, they didn't. In fact, when asked, David Heyman said 2 films didn't mean everything would be included. By definition, an adaptation cannot simply duplicate the novel.

Quote:

This shouldn't be on your news page as it's just made up gossip.
That may be true however what we've heard in the past indicates this to be true. At the end of the day, if it's made up, that buck falls down to the people who made the claim first.

WhizzyBubbles 05-09-2008 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ndebic (Post 6596671)
I was really looking forward to the wedding scene and the havoc that is created. I wonder how they will change that, and also Shell cottage.

Shame, but I must admit she never was the Fleur I imagined

I agree. When I first saw Clemence Poesy, it was, like, the complete opposite of how I pictured Fleur. I despised Clemence, so to speak.

I really do wonder how they will leave out the wedding and shell cottage, they must include those scenes, and Kingsley's patronus :eyebrows:
shame ...

AndromedaBlack 05-09-2008 03:11 PM

That's stupid. We need Fleur, she's REALLY important for Deathly Hallows.

rellybelly 05-09-2008 03:45 PM

What?!?!?!? That sad...
She is really pretty!!

Godfrey Peverell 05-09-2008 03:50 PM

It just says SHE won't play Fleur...maybe they will cast someone else...hopefully...

gotta<3tonks 05-09-2008 04:25 PM

blame WB -.-!
Looks like this HP will be the worst HP ever.

Queen.Infinity 05-09-2008 06:04 PM

Um...
 
Why? Is she allergic to HP? I wonder because she was very good at the 4th one:techni:

Liisa 05-09-2008 06:39 PM

That's too bad. She was pretty good. Even though, she was honestly never quite what I had pictured in my head as "Fleur". Maybe if they replace her, they'll get it right this time.

purebloodprincess87 05-09-2008 07:02 PM

No Fleur? Call me crazy, but what's the point in splitting DH if their not gonna have EVERYTHING..including the wedding.

So if she's not gonna play Fleur and if their gonna have the wedding does that mean their's gonna be another actress playing the part?

laura-tonks 05-09-2008 08:18 PM

i really wish the bill/fleur storyline hadn't been cut:(

fallen-angel 05-09-2008 08:33 PM

Why? =[ Shame.

Mrs_Molly_Weasley 05-09-2008 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purebloodprincess87 (Post 6601953)
No Fleur? Call me crazy, but what's the point in splitting DH if their not gonna have EVERYTHING..including the wedding.

So if she's not gonna play Fleur and if their gonna have the wedding does that mean their's gonna be another actress playing the part?


It better not be! I am already upset that Clemence isnt in it.... they better not get me more mad!

>=o,

Night_Owl 05-09-2008 11:01 PM

really she wasn't a good actress

BreBear 05-09-2008 11:35 PM

UPDATE:

That's great <3

Zoe 05-10-2008 12:33 AM

I hope that she's in the last one. if she isn't, it'll ruin everything with the whole wedding at the Weasley's and stuff.

Maxilocks 05-10-2008 01:46 AM

Thank God she isn't leaving... I adore her and her acting, even though they made her seem like a silly, high school girl in the fourth movie. :/


ladycplum 05-10-2008 01:52 AM

People people PEOPLE! The report has now been updated, and even if Clemence does not return NOBODY HAS SAID THAT THE CHARACTER OF FLEUR HERSELF IS BEING CUT FROM THE FILM! Keep calm, it's another 2-3 years away, a LOT can change in that time.

Emma C.D. Watson 05-10-2008 06:27 AM

i hope she returns....i really want her as fleur...i dont think it's good they change her u know...

pizza18 05-10-2008 07:31 AM

lol I got the update, she did not say she would not be in too,

EmmaRiddle 05-10-2008 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladycplum (Post 6604122)
People people PEOPLE! The report has now been updated, and even if Clemence does not return NOBODY HAS SAID THAT THE CHARACTER OF FLEUR HERSELF IS BEING CUT FROM THE FILM! Keep calm, it's another 2-3 years away, a LOT can change in that time.

Actually, the script's being written right now :lol:

Quote:

Call me crazy, but what's the point in splitting DH if their not gonna have EVERYTHING..including the wedding.
To make money? :lol:

Quote:

So if she's not gonna play Fleur and if their gonna have the wedding does that mean their's gonna be another actress playing the part?
I really can't see her making the cut. Another character can easily serve her function in the plot.

Shopgirl3876 05-10-2008 03:42 PM

How could she not be in it??????????? It's HISTORY their making!!!!!

ladycplum 05-10-2008 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EmmaRiddle (Post 6605350)
I really can't see her making the cut. Another character can easily serve her function in the plot.

Gotta disagree with you again on that point. Without Fleur and Bill and the wedding, Aunti Muriel disappears, along with her fantastic insights into Dumbledore's family, and Kingsley's news of the fall of the Ministry, and Shell Cottage disappears, along with Dobby's burial, talk of how to get into Gringott's, the news of Teddy's birth, all that stuff. You may say that another character can fill the function and that these pieces of storyline could be moved to other areas, if they're left in at all, but I don't think so. And if you cut all that out, then you might as well chop the epilogue to shreds, if THAT'S left in at all too.

bluewings16 05-10-2008 08:11 PM

no fleur
then is there gonna be a wedding and are they going to cut out everything else out?
if they are, it's gonna be a really short movie to watch

Doriss 05-10-2008 09:46 PM

It's not gonna be short ! It's gonna be boring! They will record two movies, how can it be short?

EmmaRiddle 05-11-2008 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladycplum (Post 6607233)
Gotta disagree with you again on that point. Without Fleur and Bill and the wedding, Aunti Muriel disappears, along with her fantastic insights into Dumbledore's family, and Kingsley's news of the fall of the Ministry, and Shell Cottage disappears, along with Dobby's burial, talk of how to get into Gringott's, the news of Teddy's birth, all that stuff. You may say that another character can fill the function and that these pieces of storyline could be moved to other areas, if they're left in at all, but I don't think so. And if you cut all that out, then you might as well chop the epilogue to shreds, if THAT'S left in at all too.

The wedding could be substituted with different character. I don't think Muriel is intrinsic and Dumbledore's family will probably be largely glossed over - it's way too complicated for cinema and it contains elements which are far from family friendly. Everything else could be linked into Lupin/Tonks, for example. Cinema audiences have a somewhat larger investment in them. I don't see how the epilogue can be done onscreen, unless they use prosthetics. To end the film series with anyone other than Dan, Rupert & Emma would be anticlimatic. Plus, it was shoddy writing anyway :lol:

Eclipsed 05-11-2008 11:49 AM

But doesn't she play quite a role in DH? Both her and Bill? And then when some of the OtP members stay at their house? :blink:

And omg, the wedding!

ladycplum 05-12-2008 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EmmaRiddle (Post 6612090)
The wedding could be substituted with different character. I don't think Muriel is intrinsic and Dumbledore's family will probably be largely glossed over - it's way too complicated for cinema and it contains elements which are far from family friendly. Everything else could be linked into Lupin/Tonks, for example. Cinema audiences have a somewhat larger investment in them. I don't see how the epilogue can be done onscreen, unless they use prosthetics. To end the film series with anyone other than Dan, Rupert & Emma would be anticlimatic. Plus, it was shoddy writing anyway :lol:


Yeah but they're once again shorting the bibliophiles like myself by dumbing down the books for mass consumption. And if anything, the wedding's great for bringing Victor back!!!! They're shoving Cho down our throats again in this movie to resolve whatever's left between her and Harry, so they'd better bring Krum back!

Shoddy writing? Oh precious precious precious :gollum2: (You do realize I only put that in since you said it creeps you out) :mwaha: I have no problems with prosthetics, or CGI makeup or whatever, works good enough on turning a ridiculously gorgeous man like Ralph Fiennes into Voldythingy!

EmmaRiddle 05-12-2008 02:56 PM

^ But Cho is pretty :lol: They seem to like romance so I reckon Krum might make it, to stir up R/Hr.

:lol:

ladycplum 05-12-2008 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EmmaRiddle (Post 6618025)
^ But Cho is pretty :lol: They seem to like romance so I reckon Krum might make it, to stir up R/Hr.

:lol:


Well heck if they had problems killing off the pretty people Cedric would still be alive! And Tonks, and Lupin AND SIRIUS! :mwaha:

TheGreatWiz 05-14-2008 08:41 PM

Aww! that stinks. Like the picture though :lol:

touchdownking 05-18-2008 03:33 AM

yeah, she is how i actually pictured Fleur when I read the books....however i'm sure that a suitable replacement could be found...

Mari of the Ocean 06-21-2008 03:16 AM

why??? it's soooo sad!!

puffy 07-02-2008 06:46 AM

Quote:

wow I mean the wedding is in the Deathly Hallows, that is an important scene in the book and it has to be in the movie, but they are plenty of French chicks out there that would love to be in a HP movie

this is critical to the plot, that horrible weasley aunt reveals to harry a lot of things about dumbledor.
yeess,i totaly agree with that ! they always cut out some of the scenes! i hope this is not true !

Merope Gaunt 07-02-2008 12:45 PM

It will be interesting to see how they suddenly make Bill and Fleur have their wedding in the DH movie, when so far in the films there has been no sign of Bill Weasley (Well... except for a tiny picture on the Daily Prophet in PoA, the Egypt trip) and as there is no sign of Bill or Fleur being in HBP, they will have to do some good script writing to cover up a whole missed storyline.

But Fleur can be replaced. Fleur can be replaced just like Dumbledore was (RIP Richard Harris) it won't be the end of the world if another actress takes the role. And as many different people have already said, nowhere has it been said the character won't appear, just Clemence won't be taking on the role.

Lets all just get HBP over and done with before we all start having anurisms over the next one.

Kiki_Potter_103 07-02-2008 01:56 PM

that's very sad to hear =[

nevvysevvy90 07-10-2008 04:13 PM

I hope it's merely the actress that wont be appearing in the film and not the character.... that would completely throw off the plot and I'm so tired of seeing the Harry Potter books being gutted


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Site designed by Richard Harris Design


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260