That's a bit ... odd. I'm sure they could've just went and picked some random person to be "The Hands". I don't really see why they had to get another Tom Riddle just to do a scene that would probably take a few moments to get through.

Wow....

I dont know if I would be irked or if I would think that was kool...

:hmm:

wow that kinda sux. At least he can say he was in a popular film .....

mmmmm okayyyyyyyyyy

:hermy: it kinda is a slap in the face...cuz why cast an actor..if they're gonna use his hands only?silly..they can use some one's hands..and make do!

ok......weird, seriously

Lol I suppose it's better than nothing!!!! :xd:

well at least his hands get to be in the film jaja :D

wow at least he has a part in the film

what's wrong with the other dudes hands?

Er...how interestingly odd.

ok..whats the point of that? i'm nut hands will change from the age of 16-18..

I don't understand why they have to drag some 18-year old in to show his hands for one second.
They could've used anyone elses hands - someone already in the film for example!
Ah well.. (:

Whatever happened to Christian Coulson?

Thats.. Strange ? x)

Christian is 30 now, way too matured to be playing a 16 or 18 year old.

come to think of it, he could play the 18 year old Tom Riddle, since all they needed were a pair of hands ;)

well,thats kinda weird.why not use the 16 year olds hands?or crew's hands?

curiuos but still better to be in a HP film than not. still can't understand why Michael's getting a credit for his hand-y work! LOL!

That's good! I honestly didn't think that actor would be good as the 18-year old Tom Riddle. If I were him and he knew they'd only be using his hands in the movie, I wouldn't have accepted the role. He probably only accepted for the money.

He would probably cost too much. Let's face it, with an actor that experienced, it would be an insult (a total waste of his time).

Stranger things have happened. :lol:

Huh wierd

That's strange...