SnitchSeeker.com

SnitchSeeker.com (https://www.snitchseeker.com/forum.php)
-   Harry Potter News (https://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/)
-   -   Opinion:Azkaban was much better than the first two (https://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/opinion-azkaban-was-much-better-than-the-first-two-17661/)

ruperts_babe 07-16-2004 07:38 AM

http://www.snitchseeker.com/images/n..._cuaron_80.jpg Opinion:Azkaban was much better than the first two - a wizardnews follow-up

Summary:
At the end of last month, I posted a news article about an Open Letter to Mike Newell, the director of the next Harry Potter film. Here is a response to it.

Article:

Thanks to Wizardnews for this interesting read

Quote:

Regarding the "Open Letter to Mike Newell" published recently on Wizard News, I do not believe it was an accurate representation of how all fans feel about Alfonso Cuaron's direction of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.

Ironically, the thing I found missing in the first two movies was the very thing the author of the open letter found missing in Prisoner of Azkaban: a heart. There was nothing obviously wrong with the first two movies, the deviations from the book were very few and far between, and the acting was superb for the most part, yet I remained emotionless the entire viewing.

Quote:

Prisoner of Azkaban, on the other hand, moved me to the point of tears the second time I saw it. To me, Prisoner of Azkaban had far more depth than the first two, and I loved what Alphonso Cuaron did with this movie.

I also think the cinematography of the first two movies was bland when compared to Prisoner of Azkaban. Even after repeated viewings I am still moved by the beauty of scenes like the forest at night, the Dementors by the lake, and Harry’s hippogriff ride. I also think the people in the pictures on the walls added delightful humour to the movie.


Quote:

Of course, this is all just my opinion. But when it comes to whether the third movie portrayed the essence of the books, there is one person who definitely should know better than anyone, and that is J. K. Rowling. And she loved it (check out her comments on it at her official website, www.jkrowling.com). Not only has she stated that it was her favorite movie, but that Cuaron was so in tune with the books and where the series was headed he inadvertently included foreshadowing to books 6 and 7.


Quote:

It is inevitable that Mike Newell’s Hogwarts will be different from Chris Columbus’s. If Mike Newell tried to emulate Chris Columbus, he would end up with only a pale, flat echo of Columbus’s work. The best results for Goblet of Fire will result only if Mike Newell believes in what he is doing and uses his passion and originality to shape it.

I thank Alfonso Cuaron for carrying out his vision of an amazing and touching movie, and I have high hopes he will take on another Harry Potter film in the future. All the best of luck to Mr. Newell, and I cannot wait to see his rendition of Goblet of Fire!*


Wizardnews

harryluva 07-16-2004 10:23 AM

i agree with every word. mike newell should definitely not try to emulate anyone else. he should direct it in the way he wants to, not how others woul had they directed it.

PS- yay! first to post! :flowersmile:

angels-in-my-heart 07-16-2004 11:30 AM

I also agree, I loved PoA especially because of its depth even though things were left out!

Pookah 07-16-2004 05:02 PM

Totally agree with everything in that letter! :sorcerer:

Live in the UK? PLEASE SIGN Xylophone Man Petition

HP1FAN2004 07-16-2004 05:05 PM

i agree.i think he should dircet the way he wants to and he shouldnt push other people into doing things that they maybe dont want to do. POA was awsome but so were the other two movies. i cant wait to see what the others will be like. please keep mike as the directer of the harry potter films!

Hermione778 07-16-2004 05:47 PM

angels-in-my-heart@july16
Quote:

I agree,I loved PoA because of its depth, even though things were left out
I thought PoA ROCKED but they left out so many things. Like the fact that Cho Chang was supposed to be tailing Harry during Quidditch!!!!! :hello:




~KC~ :sorcerer:

vietgirlz_8706 07-17-2004 01:51 AM

that really cool!

Ospreyone 07-17-2004 05:31 AM

Gag on my own vomit.

POA was unworthy of the book it destroyed.

From start to finish, it took a great book and utterly abandoned it, heart and soul.

I too was nearly moved to tears; tears of rage as I saw what Alfonz did to a great book.

EmmaRiddle 07-17-2004 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ospreyone@Jul 17 2004, 03:05 AM
Gag on my own vomit.

POA was unworthy of the book it destroyed.

From start to finish, it took a great book and utterly abandoned it, heart and soul.

I too was nearly moved to tears; tears of rage as I saw what Alfonz did to a great book.

How can he be persecuted for setting Hogwarts in the right place for once?

EmmaRiddle 07-17-2004 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hermione778@Jul 16 2004, 03:21 PM
angels-in-my-heart@july16
Quote:

I agree,I loved PoA because of its depth, even though things were left out
I thought PoA ROCKED but they left out so many things. Like the fact that Cho Chang was supposed to be tailing Harry during Quidditch!!!!! :hello:




~KC~ :sorcerer:

It was known for months beforehand that Cho would not be in it. She wasn't important to the story.

ruperts babe 07-18-2004 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by vietgirlz_8706@Jul 16 2004, 06:25 PM
that really cool!
i dont know they did leave some parts out and i did love the movie but well i guess it was allright but really they left a lot of parts out!

ruperts babe 07-18-2004 11:40 PM

alfonso did a great job but he did'nt put the whole quidditch parts in esspecially when they won the world cup

MiraL75 07-19-2004 12:48 AM

I also loved PoA, and can't wait for GoF to come out!

Shacklebolt 07-19-2004 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Marcella_Riddle+Jul 17 2004, 06:12 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Marcella_Riddle @ Jul 17 2004, 06:12 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Ospreyone@Jul 17 2004, 03:05 AM
Gag on my own vomit.*

POA was unworthy of the book it destroyed.*

From start to finish, it took a great book and utterly abandoned it, heart and soul.*

I too was nearly moved to tears; tears of rage as I saw what Alfonz did to a great book.

How can he be persecuted for setting Hogwarts in the right place for once? [/b][/quote]
I could not disagree with you more, Ospreyone. He added a certain depth to Hogwarts that Columbus could never dream of doing.

I think Marcella_Riddle has it right.

She-Who-Is-Not-To-Be-Psycho! 07-20-2004 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mohamedg24+Jul 19 2004, 02:54 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (mohamedg24 @ Jul 19 2004, 02:54 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Marcella_Riddle@Jul 17 2004, 06:12 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Ospreyone
Quote:

@Jul 17 2004, 03:05 AM
Gag on my own vomit.*

POA was unworthy of the book it destroyed.*

From start to finish, it took a great book and utterly abandoned it, heart and soul.*

I too was nearly moved to tears; tears of rage as I saw what Alfonz did to a great book.


How can he be persecuted for setting Hogwarts in the right place for once?

I could not disagree with you more, Ospreyone. He added a certain depth to Hogwarts that Columbus could never dream of doing.

I think Marcella_Riddle has it right. [/b][/quote]
And I think everybody is biased on their fav director. Columbus was a horrible director: none of his work in worth the filth in my hair! If comparison is made, yes, Cuadron is VERY much a better director. But that doesn't mean he actually did his job! That wasn't the PoA movie, that wasn't the book story-line, THAT WAS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MOVIE WITH THE SAME NAME! In other words, that was a FANFICTION of a fan with too much free time and no good interpretation as a director... but I was a fool to expect more...and one thing I agree with Ospreyone is that I nearly cried of rage when I saw it!

Do I even have to tell why I think it was that way? The only thiunk I keep enjoying about the movies are Alan Rickman as Snape, and one or two scenes that Cuadrón (and Cuadrón only) got right - on its character interpretation at least.

hermioneg288 07-20-2004 03:42 AM

i agree with the letter-it was so much more emotional and moving-it was definitely my favorite film!!
Chris Columbus is not a horrible director though!!! i think he did an excellent job with PS and COS!! i felt emotional during those too-but more so in POA. Chris created this whole HP world and it is very hard to do something like that-i just think it was great! i love PS and COS very much! they were my favorite films ever until POA, now COS is in 2nd place then PS-but they're very close!! i love all the films but i definitely POA ruled out-it rocks!!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Site designed by Richard Harris Design


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264