SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post - Film: The Half-Blood Prince (2009)

Lord_Istar · 07-16-2009, 06:56 AM

the movie "as a movie" was great.
as a book adaptation it was terrible.

im sorry but the director needs to be fired.

in the beginning of the movie was NOTHING like the book. and in a BAD way:

i think we all wanted to see the dursleys getting hit in the head by wine glasses
dumbledore NEVER told harry to keep his cloak on him at all times
dumbledore never compliments harry on his sirius death coping abilities
and the weaslys didnt knwo harry was coming.

now the end of the movie:

harry looked like a coward in the dumbledore death scene. in the book he was petrified it was OK. he had a choice but they just made him look weak.

the lack of dumbledores funeral was so STUPID. nuff said

now for just random stuff i noticed through the move

6 chasers not 3?
the look of the ring (horcrux) it was not "hallowy" ( no hallows simbol os sword mark)
what did they do to the hogwarts express?
why did harry use the instant darkness powder on said hogwarts express
they cut out bill and fluer
they cut out tonks and lupin
sectemsempra WAS NOT sword slashes as it was supposed to
a distinct lack of dobby and kreacher
and much more but im getting angry so.... ya.

now someone PLEASE explain the burrow attack???? they have that but no funeral. could Yates DUPR DE HURP any more?????

okay to the fangirl who i beleive will agree. the harry ginny love affair. done poorly and rushed, and the kiss sucked. personally i dont care but my mother made me mention it.

they put in the important scenes, but none of the minor scenes that made those important scenes make sense. like, they never explained about the inferi, so it was just like wth? Why is harry being atacked by Golem's mutated spawn? And how in the end of the movie we can just assume he told ron and hermione about the horcruxes because while they were never discussed amongst them, they were suddenly very well informed at the end

now they did SOME good. the potions scenes were perfect ( love and felix)
the acting was great
tom riddle was spot on
ron/hermiony/lavender love/jealous thing was great

other than the golem spawn the dumbledore cave scene was GREAT.

oh on a random not WHY WAS ARAGOG SMALLER THAN HAGRID

thats my rant

07-16-2009, 06:56 AM	#14 (permalink)
Lord_Istar Bundimun Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 25	the movie "as a movie" was great. as a book adaptation it was terrible. im sorry but the director needs to be fired. in the beginning of the movie was NOTHING like the book. and in a BAD way: i think we all wanted to see the dursleys getting hit in the head by wine glasses dumbledore NEVER told harry to keep his cloak on him at all times dumbledore never compliments harry on his sirius death coping abilities and the weaslys didnt knwo harry was coming. now the end of the movie: harry looked like a coward in the dumbledore death scene. in the book he was petrified it was OK. he had a choice but they just made him look weak. the lack of dumbledores funeral was so STUPID. nuff said now for just random stuff i noticed through the move 6 chasers not 3? the look of the ring (horcrux) it was not "hallowy" ( no hallows simbol os sword mark) what did they do to the hogwarts express? why did harry use the instant darkness powder on said hogwarts express they cut out bill and fluer they cut out tonks and lupin sectemsempra WAS NOT sword slashes as it was supposed to a distinct lack of dobby and kreacher and much more but im getting angry so.... ya. now someone PLEASE explain the burrow attack???? they have that but no funeral. could Yates DUPR DE HURP any more????? okay to the fangirl who i beleive will agree. the harry ginny love affair. done poorly and rushed, and the kiss sucked. personally i dont care but my mother made me mention it. they put in the important scenes, but none of the minor scenes that made those important scenes make sense. like, they never explained about the inferi, so it was just like wth? Why is harry being atacked by Golem's mutated spawn? And how in the end of the movie we can just assume he told ron and hermione about the horcruxes because while they were never discussed amongst them, they were suddenly very well informed at the end now they did SOME good. the potions scenes were perfect ( love and felix) the acting was great tom riddle was spot on ron/hermiony/lavender love/jealous thing was great other than the golem spawn the dumbledore cave scene was GREAT. oh on a random not WHY WAS ARAGOG SMALLER THAN HAGRID thats my rant Last edited by Lord_Istar; 07-16-2009 at 06:57 AM. Reason: hit post before i was done