View Single Post
Old 11-23-2010, 07:17 PM   #31 (permalink)
mr_bellamy
Members
Bundimun
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vargaroth View Post
Had Yates stuck with the book in terms of Ron dancing with Hermione at the wedding i would probably agree with you. However, even the small moments that Ron/Hermione had really wasnt enough and still left a lot of doubt there. I think adding the "stone" scene would of set it up perfectly because according to the book Hermione becomes "devastated" by Ron's dept. I think the stone scene would of made everything better personally. And of course the line about "Hermione being like a sister" would of helped dramatically as well.
I agree with that too, and yes, more context to Hermione's devastation (which I think was still portrayed very accurately) would always be a good thing. But as someone said above, there are so many different facets that go into making a decision on a movie, and I think the real problem isn't that Yates ships Harry/Hermione or anything, but it's just that he seems kind of disorganized and like he doesn't have a really clear idea of the movie in his head before he shoots. It seems like he's more the kind of director who likes to shoot a bunch of scenes and then string them all together in the editing room. So he was probably out in Scotland, thought "Hey, Rupert and Emma! I got a great idea, let's shoot some footage of you guys throwing stones together!" and then in the editing room, thought "Aw, this is a great scene, but doesn't really work in the movie like I hoped." We saw the same thing happen with the ending of Part I, where he had to change it last minute because it didn't work like he hoped it would. That's the real problem.
mr_bellamy is offline   Reply With Quote