Quote:
Actually, wikipedia was compared to the encyclopedia britainica, and it seemed to hold its own in terms of accuracy.
That's true but as it relies upon submissions, it is still open to abuse and bias. Furthermore that was in 2005, roughly 2 years ago.
You're right though, topics such are these are supposed to generate discussion

I was just highlighting, for others who may not be aware, that Wiki isn't a reliable source. As you can see, that was not in place of discussion