SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post

Fira · 09-11-2011, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinky

... Um no. "Children perform magic without meaning to all the time, actually. And to be a bit clearer on this subject: Professor Glass asked if there is a rigid definition for Dark Arts. And also asked what it is that we understand. Well I am merely proving my point here; I do not think there is a rigid definition BECAUSE there is so much grey area. Meaning there are harmless spells that can be cast with the intent to harm. And I never mentioned a Dark Witch or Wizard... I used myself as an example here. If I were to use a harmless spell would for malicious intent would it be considered Dark. I am fairly certain debate on this subject matter will be ever going and for that matter each and every person in this room may have differing opinions on the matter... there is too much grey area when it comes to Dark Arts," she said evenly, clearly, and slower than normal because in her opinion... she was making perfect sense, but apparently some people couldn't grasp the simple concept.

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeh...hey hey hey. What was making this lioness so...harsh with the subject? Josh hoped she had no dark mind hidden inside her head somewhere or something like that. ''Geez. Girl. I do know children perform magic unintentionally.'' Was that really what she understood from what he had said? The hoped not. ''By using the word 'kid' i just tried to make it sound like 'a person with an innocent mind' not children who has no idea of their magic. But maybe i used the wrong word. Maybe.''

Apparently he needed to be more careful with words while talking to her since she seemed to keep misunderstanding him. ''I do understand your idea of there no being a rigid definition and grey areas and stuff and i do respect it though i don't think it works that way anyway. It's your opinion, though, not a fact. And i did not say you mentioned those. I merely gave an example and said it was probably similar to the ideas of a dark witch or wizard.'' Yes. He needed use words more carefully. ''But you still don't understand what i try to tell you. I am not talking about your thoughts or being against it...completely. I am just talking about the spell itself being created for dark purposes. And for whatever intent it is used, for example, Aguamenti is NOT a dark spell. If you kill someone with it. It is the work of a bad intention. But do you think everything bad is considered dark? I think that can be discussed as well. It is like the the difference between a dementor and a bad mannered unicorn horning you to kill. See it?''

09-11-2011, 07:02 PM	#406 (permalink)
Fira Doxy Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: GMT+3 Posts: 6,022 Hogwarts RPG Name: Hunter Carter First Year x5 x4	9 3/4 ticket holder / The SS Mentalist / Sherlock / The Master Of Everything / Josh + <3 = Ev Quote: Originally Posted by Pinky ... Um no. "Children perform magic without meaning to all the time, actually. And to be a bit clearer on this subject: Professor Glass asked if there is a rigid definition for Dark Arts. And also asked what it is that we understand. Well I am merely proving my point here; I do not think there is a rigid definition BECAUSE there is so much grey area. Meaning there are harmless spells that can be cast with the intent to harm. And I never mentioned a Dark Witch or Wizard... I used myself as an example here. If I were to use a harmless spell would for malicious intent would it be considered Dark. I am fairly certain debate on this subject matter will be ever going and for that matter each and every person in this room may have differing opinions on the matter... there is too much grey area when it comes to Dark Arts," she said evenly, clearly, and slower than normal because in her opinion... she was making perfect sense, but apparently some people couldn't grasp the simple concept. Eeeeeeeeeeeeeh...hey hey hey. What was making this lioness so...harsh with the subject? Josh hoped she had no dark mind hidden inside her head somewhere or something like that. ''Geez. Girl. I do know children perform magic unintentionally.'' Was that really what she understood from what he had said? The hoped not. ''By using the word 'kid' i just tried to make it sound like 'a person with an innocent mind' not children who has no idea of their magic. But maybe i used the wrong word. Maybe.'' Apparently he needed to be more careful with words while talking to her since she seemed to keep misunderstanding him. ''I do understand your idea of there no being a rigid definition and grey areas and stuff and i do respect it though i don't think it works that way anyway. It's your opinion, though, not a fact. And i did not say you mentioned those. I merely gave an example and said it was probably similar to the ideas of a dark witch or wizard.'' Yes. He needed use words more carefully. ''But you still don't understand what i try to tell you. I am not talking about your thoughts or being against it...completely. I am just talking about the spell itself being created for dark purposes. And for whatever intent it is used, for example, Aguamenti is NOT a dark spell. If you kill someone with it. It is the work of a bad intention. But do you think everything bad is considered dark? I think that can be discussed as well. It is like the the difference between a dementor and a bad mannered unicorn horning you to kill. See it?'' __________________ Auror • YATIL_.________The clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy... ...but does not allow the enemy's will to be imposed on him.