sitemap
FOLLOW SNITCHSEEKER:

Email Us!

Hogwarts RPG

Students: 9872
Classes: 15
Professors: 12

00
00
View Points

Members

There are 1104 users online including...
Natashayvy , PhoenixRising , PhilipLasty , DuckyLinJi , Ver , Eldarhmb , Eldarjxt

8 members
1096 guests.

Members in Chat:



If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   SnitchSeeker.com > Forums > Daily Prophet (News) > Harry Potter News


Harry Potter News Latest news and rumors about the Harry Potter world!

All News Forum Rules and FAQs apply. Click to view.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-05-2006, 12:09 AM
EmmaRiddle EmmaRiddle is offline
 
Post Steve Kloves interview in 'Creative Screenwriting'

Steve Kloves talks about writing the Harry Potter scripts in the new issue of Creative Screenwriting magazine.

Four scans can be viewed here courtesy of Veritaserum.

Quote:
"I'm sympathetic to Chris [Columbus] because Chris has pretty good commercial interests," concedes Kloves, "and I even know people who thought 'Chamber of Secrets' was too scary for very little kids. Had we hit the mudblood thing even harder, God knows."
Quote:
After seeing what they did in 'Philosopher's Stone', "it invigorated me to write for them. I think I know what Emma can do, I think I know what Dan can do, I think I know where Dan can be funny and where it's forcing it. It has less to do with Dan than it does with Harry. Harry can be funny in a certain kind of moment. You don't want him to carry the joke. Hermione is funny in her obsessiveness, and Emma can handle that very, very well. And Rupert is a kind of genius. I really believe that. I think Rupert is someone that has made lines hysterical that, honestly, I don't think are that funny."
Quote:
At the same time, Kloves feels a certain protectiveness for his characters, and Ron is a good example of where Kloves fought to give a character more dimension. Acknowledging, "that there will always be a tendency to default to Ron being funny," Kloves has believed that, "for a couple of movies that Ron needs to evolve and show some spine," which he does in 'Goblet of Fire'. Kloves appealed to Newell, who agreed that Ron not be "just the trembling sidekick."
Quote:
Two innocent lives are hanging in the balance, but Kloves works in a comic line to ease the tension; "Does my hair really look like that?" Kloves "knew that Emma would kill that line. Up till now she's driven the scene for two minutes. It just makes her a real girl. I knew that Emma would do it well because Emma is a real girl. Underneath it all, there's fragility, and that's the kind of stuff you love to write for an actor. Everytime I saw it with an audience, people laughed because they recognised the truth of it."
Quote:
The moment occurs on the train, and Newell plays it very subtly; so subtly, in fact, that "at first I thought it was too subtle. But it doesn't matter because it isn't a plot moment, so people will either pick up on it or not." When Ron orders a couple of items off the trolley and realises he only has enough money for one, Harry offers to pay, to which Ron responds, "'No, no, it's alright.' But it's not accented at all. You'll miss it in a second if you're not watching for it. But it's character-consistant, which is nice. Ron doesn't want Harry paying his way. Rupert turns away, doesn't even make an issue of it. That's a sign of maturity on Ron's part, which is, 'Let's not even talk about it.'"
Quote:
In Ron's case, "he's always had brothers who are more talented and more gifted and is just starting to come into is skin and realise that he has talents of his own."

Hermione "ultimately knows that she relies on her intellect," and Kloves fondly recalls the way Hermione plays Poirot: "In one draft for each film, I've had Hermione saying, 'This doesn't make sense.' She's cogitating about something. And thank God she's there, because Harry and Ron, left to their own devices, might just walk off the battlements, and that would be the end of it."

But Harry "is a darker character than people realise." One must never forget that Harry "was abused as a child. For all the comic exaggeration of the Dursleys, they locked him in a cupboard for a decade. So everything Harry sees is still through the tiny eyes of a boy peering out at the cracks of light from a cupboard."
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 04:25 AM   #51 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
Jarvey
 
wheezy's gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 657
Default

For me, no way... no mercy for Kloves!

He ruined movie!Ron, JKR's lines are witty enough and he should not have changed them anymore. He could do a variation, or add lines as long as these are still consistent with JKR's characterization of the trio in the books, but that's NOT what he did. He has no respect for the true fans of the books/characters, so he gets no respect from me too.

To each his own (and I'm in good company here).
__________________
(°·.¸(¨*·.¸ Proud Keeper of Rupert's Luscious Red Hair ¸.·*¨)¸.·°)

"Driving Lessons"
Synopsis ~ Oscar buzz ~ Rave Reviews
wheezy's gal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 01:44 AM   #52 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Red Cap
 
mclay18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 84
Default

Wow, you people are being overtly harsh on Kloves. I completely understand and comprehend your reasons for criticizing him, but in all honesty, you focus on the negative aspects of Kloves's screenplays and not mention the positive aspects of his writing. I don't see J.K. Rowling making a big fuss about it (she after all gives final script approval for the films) and I don't have a problem with it.

I'm looking forward to see what Michael Goldenberg does with OOTP (he did a fantastic job on Contact and Peter Pan), but the idea of having different screenwriters for each film is just ridiculous, because one of the major keys in whether a movie fails or succeeds is the quality of the screenplay (aside from the direction and acting). Sure, the screenwriters can add their own touch, but what if they're really bad at just screen-writing in general? (Such as A Sound of Thunder, a monstrosity of a film that was based on a wonderful short story by Ray Bradbury.) I'd rather have someone who's been doing the scripts for the previous films, because I know what to expect from the person(s) doing it. (I'm pretty confident in Goldenberg, because he's done this sort of book-to-movie adaptation before.)

Some screenwriters are just inept at book-to-movie adaptations, while some are really good at it. If OOTP and HBP is good, then I'd like Goldenberg and Kloves to collaborate on the final film.

Last edited by mclay18; 02-09-2006 at 01:47 AM.
mclay18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 03:58 AM   #53 (permalink)
Slytherin
Jarvey
 
Sollust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 501
Slytherin

Fascinating. Thanks.
Sollust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.


This Harry Potter and Wizarding World fan website and community is not endorsed by Hogwarts, Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling, Warner Bros., Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Quidditch, Deathly Hallows, Sorcerer's Stone, Wizards, Muggles, No-Maj, MACUSA, Newt Scamander, Video Games, Half-Blood Prince, Orders of the Phoenix, Goblet of Fire, Philosopher's Stones, Chamber of Secret, Pottermore, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, Eddie Redmayne, Cursed Child, or any other official Harry Potter source.

All content is copyright ©2002 - 2022, SnitchSeeker.com unless stated otherwise. Privacy Policy

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Site designed by Richard Harris Design

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225