SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post - SnitchSeeker's Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I full set visit report

mr_bellamy · 10-06-2010, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnlocke06

''… There’s a moment in the film where Harry and Hermione dance for the first time. It’s full of proper sexual tension because they’re both teenagers and they’re at that stage where Ron’s left and there’s a sort of intimacy between them."

What the hell is this? *groan*

What the hell is this? This is David Yates, once again, over-exaggerating something about his grand epic masterpiece because he's an ~artist~. He said the Dumbledore Vs. Voldemort battle was like the D-Day landing at Normandy Beach. He said the Half-Blood Prince movie was going to be all "sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll" and that it was going to be extremely reminiscent of the movies "American Graffiti" and "Trainspotting". He said that all of the Harry/Ginny scenes were going to be very realistic and moving, and full of a lot of raw, romantic, sexual energy. Uhhhhhhh no. Sorry, Yates.

He's a movie director and he's got a lot of creativity and passion for his projects, so he attaches a lot of powerful, controversial adjectives to his projects to get people excited and talking. I've noticed that Daniel Radcliffe tends to do the same thing. They're just blowing hot air, fueling the hype machine. The people who actually saw the movie, without bias, said that it's just a cute little scene where Harry walks into the tent, sees Hermione sitting alone, completely miserable, pining for Ron, and listening to the Muggle radio, and so he tries to cheer her up by making her get up and dance with him. You could probably read into it that it's full of "sexual power" or whatever, but you can read a lot of things into a lot of things, know what I mean?

10-06-2010, 04:05 AM	#21 (permalink)
mr_bellamy Bundimun Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 34	Quote: Originally Posted by johnlocke06 ''… There’s a moment in the film where Harry and Hermione dance for the first time. It’s full of proper sexual tension because they’re both teenagers and they’re at that stage where Ron’s left and there’s a sort of intimacy between them." What the hell is this? groan What the hell is this? This is David Yates, once again, over-exaggerating something about his grand epic masterpiece because he's an ~artist~. He said the Dumbledore Vs. Voldemort battle was like the D-Day landing at Normandy Beach. He said the Half-Blood Prince movie was going to be all "sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll" and that it was going to be extremely reminiscent of the movies "American Graffiti" and "Trainspotting". He said that all of the Harry/Ginny scenes were going to be very realistic and moving, and full of a lot of raw, romantic, sexual energy. Uhhhhhhh no. Sorry, Yates. He's a movie director and he's got a lot of creativity and passion for his projects, so he attaches a lot of powerful, controversial adjectives to his projects to get people excited and talking. I've noticed that Daniel Radcliffe tends to do the same thing. They're just blowing hot air, fueling the hype machine. The people who actually saw the movie, without bias, said that it's just a cute little scene where Harry walks into the tent, sees Hermione sitting alone, completely miserable, pining for Ron, and listening to the Muggle radio, and so he tries to cheer her up by making her get up and dance with him. You could probably read into it that it's full of "sexual power" or whatever, but you can read a lot of things into a lot of things, know what I mean?