Members in Chat:
BertieBot, Gildebot_LockHart | |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| | HP Movie Reviews Submit & rate your own reviews about the HP Movies. | Vote for SS! 
06-21-2005, 01:10 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|  FF & P. 9¾ Mod
Kitty Momma
Rachel's Brain TwinAcromantula
Location: Within my skull. =P Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,201
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Cynder Mortiferus Nightgale (AKA: Magnus)
| 
Quote: |
Originally Posted by HarryPotterHimself The writer/director of the picture totally discluded one of the main story lines in the book, along with the entire Harry Potter saga; The Marauders. This, although not directly contributing to the main plot, is essential to Harry's relationship with both Sirius and Lupin, as well as the way he looks at his father. They cut parts that shouldn't be cut, arranged things in a chaotic, ridiculous fashion, and added things that were totally un-necissary. For example, the Firebolt. Everyone saw how misplaced this was. Why at the end? It would have been just as easy in the middle. Now Ron's not going to have Pigwidgeon. Again, not necissary, but it'd be nice. The part where Lupin in werewolf form chased Harry and Hermione was totally un-necissary, as was the part where it shows Harry and his friends eating candy. Yeah, it's nice to see how Harry and his relationships with his peers grow, but worry about that when you have all the things in the movie that were in the book. The movie, in all, was entirely too short. It was actually (it's one or the other) shorter by ten minutes, or only ten minutes longer. The same thing's going on with GoF. It's only going to be 2 hours and 30 minutes when it should be at least 3 hours 15. An extra 45 minutes does wonders, and that's what should have been done with PoA. Oh, and the scenes with the Whomping Willow. One would think that they ran out of ideas and came up short. I've had people come up to me and ask what this and that was or meant because it wasn't explained clearly or at all. And the CGI sucked!!! The Dementors were okay except for the fact that they flew. They dont fly, they glide! And the sucking of the faces..... Oh the sucking of the faces!!! That was soooo stupid-looking! The Grim was aweful too. If I'm correct in my quoting, it was "...a bear-like black dog...", meaning it was a big, broad-shouldered dog. Not some back-alley mutt that had been kicked one too many times. And Lupin as a werewolf wasn't too special either. He looked like an emaciated mutant!!!! They could have really improved on this movie. I'm scared for the fourth film. | i totally have to agree on this.
but it was okay i give it 6 out of 10
to bad they had to change the director
and they totally butchered the story line.
i must say i was very diapointed with this film
but it did have Alan Rickman in it! | 
|  | |
06-25-2005, 01:46 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Location: Romania Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 104
|
10/10 | |
| | |
06-28-2005, 04:34 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
| Formerly: Fizzing Leebee
Touzlee's Lee Leprechaun
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,351
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Flynn Docherty
First Year
Ministry RPG Name:
Crystal Zitsburg
Department of Mysteries |
it was good i dint liek some of the scenes they chose to skip or the change of setting so 6/10 | |
| | |
07-02-2005, 01:13 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
| | |
I didn't really enjoy it...sorry.3/10 | |
| | |
07-13-2005, 12:46 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
| | Banned
Location: In a Eternal Dream... Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
|
Well How bout 6/10 Yea i think tha'd be a good # yes it is  | |
| | |
07-13-2005, 09:20 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | Chizpurfle
Location: my mind... isn't that scairy?!!? Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 726
|
9/10.
the actors have REALLLLLLLLY improved. I love how the movie was darker than the other two. However, they left out some scenes I was really looking forward to. Ah well... nothing's perfect...maybe #4'll be loads more exciting and dangerous... hehe | |
| | |
07-30-2005, 07:13 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Location: Boston , USA ...and proud Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 131
|
7/10 it missed out some things but was still good
.::*Ashley-Elizabeth*::. | |
| | |
08-02-2005, 05:20 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Bundimun
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 32
|
In my opinion,there are many things that need to be fixed so that movies are more like the books  :
1.Harry's eyes NEED to be GREEN!!! They're always saying how he has his mother's eyes when he doesn't!!!
2.There needs to be better endings. The ending to the third movie was horrible!!!
3.Hermione needs to have bushier hair and larger teeth.(like in the books.)
4.The Dursleys have blond hair.(like in the books.)
5.Draco's hair needs to be slicked back.
6.There is NO choir at Hogwarts so what was with the whole frog-choir thing?
7.Some actors overreact their parts(Hermione),while other actors don't act enough(Harry)
8.The class schedules at Hogwarts are schedluled so there are only 2 house per class and in the movie there are more than 2 houses per class.
9. Harry's crying performance at Hogsmede wasn't very good either.
I hope in the future Harry Potter films to come they realize these mistakes, but somehow I doubt it. In all, I give the POA movie a 5/10 | |
| | |
08-03-2005, 07:34 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|  Official -()- SeekerFlower Child
Location: Lurking around the site somewhere!!!! Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,909
|
I'd give it 7/10
I wish they had put more information into the movie. I felt there was not enough background info for the rest of the movies. | |
| | |
08-07-2005, 05:08 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
| Tag Love Griffin
Location: Sitting on the beach Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,808
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Emily Hadenson
Ministry RPG Name:
Kimberly Long
Accidents & Catastrophes |
8/10
They did screw up the order of the movie a lot but i think that it was the best movie so far of all three. They probally should have done some things different like the firebolt should have been in the middle with an anyonomous owner and all. Ron should have gotten pigwegdon from sirius at the end of the movie. So the movie was pretty good but it could use some tweeks in its sequence order. | |
| | |
08-08-2005, 08:24 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | Banned
Location: In a Eternal Dream... Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
|
Well I didnt really "get it" the movie was all mixed up totally not exactly like the book...
eww did i say totally?! well it was an ok movie i have 2 admit but the 1st is still my fav.!!! | |
| | |
08-13-2005, 11:34 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
Location: In a galaxy far, far away... Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 35
|
It's my favorite of the hp movies they've made so far, i give it a 9/10  | |
| | |
08-23-2005, 03:23 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|  SingerDugbog
Location: Behind the Veil with Professor Snape. ;) Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 615
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Melissa
Graduated |
I loved it! I thought it was great! 8/9 out of 10 | |
| | |
08-23-2005, 03:35 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
| | Dugbog
Location: My Own Little World.... Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 626
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Jade Emma Jacobs
Third |
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sofía In my opinion,there are many things that need to be fixed so that movies are more like the books :
1.Harry's eyes NEED to be GREEN!!! They're always saying how he has his mother's eyes when he doesn't!!!
2.There needs to be better endings. The ending to the third movie was horrible!!!
3.Hermione needs to have bushier hair and larger teeth.(like in the books.)
4.The Dursleys have blond hair.(like in the books.)
5.Draco's hair needs to be slicked back.
6.There is NO choir at Hogwarts so what was with the whole frog-choir thing?
7.Some actors overreact their parts(Hermione),while other actors don't act enough(Harry)
8.The class schedules at Hogwarts are schedluled so there are only 2 house per class and in the movie there are more than 2 houses per class.
9. Harry's crying performance at Hogsmede wasn't very good either.
I hope in the future Harry Potter films to come they realize these mistakes, but somehow I doubt it. In all, I give the POA movie a 5/10 | Okay here we go...
1)Dan can't change his eye colour so too bad!
2)Okay yeah I agree the ending was a bit too, omg we've just ran out of money,
3)Emma can't change her teeth if you haven't noticed, she can't just go the dentist and say "Excuse me can you make me have larger teeth" and she can't just make her hair bushy like that, plus its fine!
4)They don't like dying peoples hair! thats why!
5) Does it matter if his hair isn't slicked back, I mean is it nessercery!
6) Once again ur obsessed now, right, they wanted to add a bit of fun into it okay, granted a bit wied but who cares!
7)Hermione's ment 2 overact and does it matter if they not like I don't know crying just because the book said its hard work for them!
8)Oh this is just getting ridiculous now, what do you want them to copy the whole page in the script or something!
9)Oh for gods sake, can you cry by youself, go on honestly say that you can just cry as like he's ment to, Dan did a good job and thats all that matters and the acting is fine and yes it wasn't like an oscar winning performance okay, but they're not like Orlando Bloom whose had lots of practice, they're only young actors!
Right okay my rating on the film was about a 7...they need to work on the endings and just a bit more correctivness on the movie and yeah I did want the Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot and Prongs bit, but I guess they couldn't fit it in, I guess they just needed 2 hurry on2 GOF.
~Elle~ | |
| | |
08-25-2005, 09:43 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
Location: the s.p.a.m goddness who lives in canada Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 651
|
well iam srry to say that this movie really upset me when i first saw it i winced a bit cuz they left out good moments and lol that last scence with dan and the fire blot crack me up cuz that look kinda demented i would give it a 6/10 i like the whomping willow part expect that part where emma grabs on to dan that looked gay and when she landed on him *cough** that was sooooo stupid and when dan is like i have a hunch **singger**** come on i was sooooo mad that director is plain LAZY like god grrrrrrr but dan look hot so yah!
CRISTALLE GLOSS FASINIERENDER GLANZ WIE REINES KRISTALL (this is german) | |
| | |
08-25-2005, 09:49 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Location: the s.p.a.m goddness who lives in canada Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 651
|
oh and by the way all u picky people who r saying dan has to have green eyes give me a break i read a artical and dans eyes r 2 sensetive to wear contancts he try 2 in the first flim they irrated his eyes and if he try wearing contacts alot he would get blind and people say he should dye his hair black R U JOKING HIS HAIR IS FINE and he wanted to but his parents wont let him and i dont want him looking gothic SO STOP PICKING ON HIM HE S GOOD THE WAY HE IS
BEAUTY IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER! | |
| | |
08-28-2005, 07:13 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|  La La BicyclePadfoot’s squeaky ballShrake
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,808
None |
the trio in jeans?! the best i've seen so far 9/10 (i think HP movies are always getting better an better...) | |
| | |
08-31-2005, 01:03 AM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Location: Pearl City HI Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 171
|
definately the best out of the 3...even though they were all good...i give a 9/10... | |
| | |
09-01-2005, 06:32 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
| | Jobberknoll
Location: New York Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 485
|
I would have to say 9/10 only because they slacked quite a bit at the ending with the firebolt, but other than that the movie was great, I think it was the best one out of the three | |
| | |
09-02-2005, 06:06 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
| | Augurey
Location: Glomping house-elves...and London Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 799
|
6/10...I'm sorry but it was just too rushed and didn't have the same feeling of the book and the plotlines were messed around with. | |
| | |
09-04-2005, 10:28 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Location: Virginia Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
|
This was my favorite movie so far, but I didn't like the new Dumbledore. I think he spoke to fast, and walked to fast. I didn't really get the idea that he was very old and very wise. I loved the way the dementors looked, though. I really loved Buckbeak and Sirius Black looked almost as I had thought he looked while I was reading the book. Peter Pettergriw looked nothing like I had thought he would look like. Overall, this was an awesome, awesome movie. I give it a 8 out of 10.  | |
| | |
09-09-2005, 04:53 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Location: Texas Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 62
|
it was the best but it did not really go with the book but it was great | |
| | |
09-11-2005, 06:22 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
| Cling Queen
Easily Distracted
Snuffles' Piglet Yeti
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,898
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Alyssandra Porter
Third Year |
I loved it....
It was awesome...and the special effects were cool | |
| | |
09-29-2005, 11:32 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
| | Bundimun
Location: Brentwood(bwood),CA Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 31
|
I don't know if this is spaming if it is sorry 4 writting this but, that movie was the BOMB! | |
| | |
10-01-2005, 04:19 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
| Library WriterSirius AuthorLeftySS100 Triumphant Chimaera
Location: Signing off SS for good…blame the workload and the hectic-ness of life. I’ll miss you all…:cry: Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,213
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Eunice Murray
Fifth | PoA
I liked this film and thought that the parts where Hermione and Harry had to go back in time was really interesting. This tied them into their own fate. THe marauder's map was really neat. There were also quite a few funny parts.
One of the things I found dissapointing, though, was that they didn't show the Quidditch cup. THis was supposed to be the year that Gryffindor won after a long time of loses. I wanted to see Oliver Wood too!
Rating: 8/10 | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
