| | |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| 
06-07-2004, 05:52 PM
| | | How Harry got his PG rating in PoA - An interview with the BBFC. Summary:
CBBC Newsround has held an interview with the BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) in order to show fans how they rate films. Article: How Harry got his PG rating in PoA
The British Board of Film Classification or BBFC is an organisation which gives out film ratings in the UK such as U, PG, 12A, 12, 15, 18 etc... (Note - a 12A is a British classification which basically means if you're under 12 you have to have an adult accompany you or else someone above the age of 16 be with you to watch the film. This rating was originally invented after the release of the first Spiderman film.)
If you want to know more about ratings go here.
Helen Pang, of the BBFC has given the CBBC a lowdown on how "Harry" got his PG rating. Newsround has the story.
Surprisingly, Prisoner of Azkaban, despite having many more curse words than the previous films, was still a PG. Here Helen explains why. Quote: What did you look for when rating The Prisoner of Azkaban?
BBFC: For a PG rating we allow violence only if there is no detail (eg swords through stomachs and lots of blood!).* But if the setting is fantasy or historical, then we sometimes allow a little more because viewers can see that it is not real or set in the present day. Quote: Were any scenes cut in order to give it a PG rating?
BBFC: We did not need to cut any scenes from the film to give it a PG.* Quote: We usually watch films and videos in pairs, and it took two days to classify HP 3.* Quote: Were there any disagreements over the rating? What happens in this circumstance?
BBFC: There were no disagreements over the rating for HP 3, as all the examiners felt that the 'scary' scenes and mild bad language would be fine at PG.*
If the two examiners in the team do disagree, for example if one examiner thought a film should be PG and the other thought it should be 12A, then the film is seen again by a second team of three examiners.* To read the rest of the article go here.
To learn more about British ratings and how the BBFC works, visit their site here.
Source: CBBC Newsround |
06-07-2004, 06:14 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Horklump
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: england
Posts: 67
|
cool
|
| |
06-07-2004, 06:52 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Doxy
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 421
|
Our ratings are easy we just have G, PG, PG13, R, X
__________________ |
| |
06-07-2004, 06:56 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Hippocampus
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Earth, UK, England,
Posts: 307
|
cool  cracking film! :sorcerer:
__________________ |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:00 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| Formerly: voldemortsucks Warning: I'm Sneaky. Hippogriff
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Florida
Posts: 3,317
Hogwarts RPG Name: Shawn Goodman First Year Ministry RPG Name:
Jake Cohen Department of Mysteries |
It was a good movie but I think that it was to scary for little kids so i think that it should of been pg13. But other than that it was an awesome movie.
__________________ Mike & Sierra: SS Lyric Pros and Beasts at Super Smash Brothers
You wish you were this cool. |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:01 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Lethifold
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: <.<
Posts: 21,039
| Twitchy TomsLovelyLady
cool. it was an awesome movie.
__________________ swirly doom |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:05 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Horklump
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: england
Posts: 67
|
cool |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:08 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| You're It! Bicorn
Join Date: May 2004 Location: In the internet.
Posts: 1,751
|
Cool
|
| |
06-07-2004, 07:08 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Ghoul
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: If I had a nickel for everytime people ask me that...
Posts: 586
|
I cant wait till they rate one PG-13 |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:19 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Poltergeist
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 17,095
Hogwarts RPG Name: Marcella Riddle Graduated | Kaplinski Rival Sorting Hat Machine
Technically the BBFC wouldn't; they'd make it a 12A. We dont have PG-13's.
|
| |
06-07-2004, 07:19 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Bicorn
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: The Highest cloud on Loon-Land
Posts: 1,808
|
I just wanna say, I wish I had their jobs, they get to watch all the movies before anyone else - NO FAIR! Where's that application form?! |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:34 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Kappa
Join Date: May 2004 Location: USA
Posts: 1,020
|
COOL
__________________ Book 7 7-7-07 |
| |
06-07-2004, 07:46 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Crup
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Andover!
Posts: 2,057
|
I saw it on June 4th... I thought it should have been a 12A - ... That book REALLY freaked me out!!
|
| |
06-07-2004, 08:17 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Guest |
I cant wait till they rate one PG-13
| |
| |
06-07-2004, 08:40 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Kappa
Join Date: May 2004 Location: USA
Posts: 1,020
|
Me Neither.
__________________ Book 7 7-7-07 |
| |
06-07-2004, 09:16 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Skrewt
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: tampa, florida
Posts: 1,341
|
me too!
|
| |
06-07-2004, 09:30 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Guest | Quote: Our ratings are easy we just have G, PG, PG13, R, X Ours (in the UK) are hardly difficult: - U - for everyone
- PG - 'Parental Consent' (parents should check first)
- 12A - recommended for over 12s, but younger kids may still watch
- 12 - only suitable for over 12s, younger kids won't be allowed in
- 15 - only suitable for over 15s
- 18 - only suitable for over 18s
I didn't think this film was going to get a PG certificate - the dementors and the scenes at the end of the book have always seemed scarier to me.
GoF and OotP will find it difficult to get PG certificates - the graveyard scene at the end of GoF and most of OotP are far too scary as they stand in the books for PG.
The 12A certificate was 'invented' for Spiderman, so perhaps it would be a good idea to use it here?
I think it was Steve Kloves who said that he didn't want to water down the books... if the books are scary, so will the films be!
| |
| |
06-07-2004, 10:23 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Banned Horklump
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Hogwarts Dreams
Posts: 55
|
harry potter iz 4 all ages!as 4 me i still watch it! if dey had rated it 18!
|
| |
06-07-2004, 11:42 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Guest |
Yeah, PG is definitely appropriate this time. I would like to see a higher rating for Goblet of Fire, because come on, it should.
| |
| |
06-08-2004, 04:32 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Dugbog
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 671
|
:sorcerer: cool, but the movie wasn't too scary...but the movie was great anyways :sorcerer:
|
| |
06-08-2004, 05:34 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
| | Bicorn
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: !. . .The Windy City. . .!
Posts: 1,850
|
lol it would be cool 2 have GOF be pg-13 or in british..... something like 12.. Yea!!!
__________________ ~Bulldogs class of 2008~ *I Rupert* |
| |
06-08-2004, 05:38 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Chizpurfle
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: CANADA & RAVENCLAW
Posts: 758
|
i wish they wud make 2 movies for GOF cuz they cant possibly fit the important stuf in a 2-3(MAX) hr movie. id b awesome if they did, but realeased them at the same time cuz i wudnt b able to wait for the second half lol
|
| |
06-08-2004, 06:58 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| | Imp
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 104
|
U.S. ratings are G, pg, pg13, r, and nc-17 and u NEVER see that unless its like porn... and violence and everyother vord is swearing... so our ratings are BORING!
__________________ XOX |
| |
06-13-2004, 05:15 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Kappa
Join Date: May 2004 Location: USA
Posts: 1,020
|
Our rating are boring.
__________________ Book 7 7-7-07 |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 PM. |