I thought I read somewhere that dan made 2 million in the 2nd movie....oh well not that it really matters

Yeah, but they're supporting characters -- think about it: Hermione was barely in the second movie, and Ron was in it a little more, but almost 60% of the scenes were all Daniel, which is a lot for a young actor, and the other 40% were also Daniel, but with Rupert and Emma as well, so they were sharing the limelight. It's not unfair, it's the reality of playing a secondary character.

I wish Rupert was payed more. :wub:
Emma...

Yeah, Rupert and Emma should be payed more than that. I mean, if Dan is payed 2 Million and then Rupert and Emma only $125,000? They should be payed more than that.

And to the Emma comment:

Er, yeah Dan is the main person but still Rupert and Emma should get paid more then that, i mean come on they are in the HARRY POTTER MOVIES, the titale itself brings in how much money and yet Rupert and Emma are only getting paid $125,000? I'm pretty sure they could afford to give them more ,even if it's only $500,000 they desearve atleast that much

they all should get paid the same....really that sucks

They could pay more according to how much Rupert and Emma are acting. Rupert was there more than Emma in COS so he should have recieved more. In the same way, Emma will be there more than Rupert in POA, so she could be paid more.

But they'll get heaps from endorsements etc... like if they put their name to any products.

ok lets not get greedy......125,000 pounds is a lot of money and they arent even adults yet. i mean, sure, dan is making a lot more money, but even so, why doeshe make that much anyway? what is he gonna do with 3.2million? acollege education doesnt cost that much thats for sure. although i do agree that rupert and emma should be making more money than they have been compared to dan, i think that how much money they make shouldnt be a huge issue. they are already making more money than most 13and 14 yr olds.....plus, shouldnt they be making the movie for people to watch and not for a bunch of money? i think they need to get their priorities straight and not worry about how much bank they are making, because whatever it may be, its a lot, and they will probably have more money than they will need for the rest of their lives

Even if they aren't making as much money as Dan, they are still getting a lot of money. Plus they have fame.

Not pounds. US dollars. I don't know how much in pounds or Euros.


Emma should be paid more. Hermione has a big part in this coming movie if you recall her role in the book.

yeah... put together Rupert and Emma are way better actors then daniel (imo)... but its not my descision to pay em.

The all should get payed the same...i mean maybe Dan could make a tad more but not that much!! They are all wonderful at what they do and its not exactly fair that Dan gets that much more. Emma is an amazing and she will do great in the future...i feal the same about Dan and Rupert but i believe that Emma has more potential.

I :heart: :sorcerer:'s
I :heart: 's

dan does play the lead, but we have to admit that rupert and emma also brings something to the franchise (not just great characterization but their fanbase as well). and it is in this note that they should have been paid a little more. from what i've read, dan's pay jump to almost 300% of what he got before was great. so why not also bestow the same to rupert and emma (not necessarily that high, but as a bonus that the movies did well and WILL do well in the future!)

incidentally, im a malfoy fan myself :mrgreen: anyone have any idea how much he's getting? :mrgreen:

Well yes to us it may seem omg they are not getting paid enough (in relation to Emma and Rupert) but if I was to change that figure to Aussie dollars thats like about 270 000 aussie dollars and that would be more than enough for me! And omg Dan gets 6 million aussie dollars! Woah!

You guys don't seem to understand that they are not being cheated or anything. Hermione and Ron ARE supporting characters and should be paid less. They are not neraly in the movie as much as Daniel and dont have nearly as many lines. I am an actress and it is really hard to do good acting. In fact it is exhausting because you put yourself into another person's life and it is hard to do that especially when you are put in the situations Harry is in. Lets face it, while Ron and Hermione are difficult characters they are a lot easier than Harry even if you just go by line amount. Besides, while Rupert may be talanted, Emma is nowhere near either one of them. In reality emma is pretty bad. I think Ruppert should be paid a little more maybe an even million or w/e as for Emma, her salary more than suits her talant.

I wouldn't be surprised if the adults, such as Hagrid, Snape, Dumbledore and Mc Gonagall got paid more then Rupert and Emma. However I suppose Hermione wasn't in the 2nd one that much, however she is in the third one more then Ron.
PS: Ron is in the limelight more
COS: Ron again
POA: Hermione gets more lime light
GOF: Hermione because of the Ron/Harry fight
OotP: Debatable but I would say Ron again.

i think they all should be paid equal amount though i agree dan's got a bigger role

I love don :wub:

I don't think they are doing Rupert and Emma right they should get the same amount of money as Dan they are just as big of a character as Dan!
they should get the right amount of money!
they are also great actors!
ronhermionefan

Look, I think that they should all get the same amount of money. So ya...

y is every1 so keen 2 no how much they get paid?i dont wanna no how much they get paid!!its none of our buisness!!!!!!!!!

LyK OmGggGGG!!!

Anyway, $125,000 is really not a lot of money. I don't think they should get paid as much as Daniel does, but still more than $125,000. They still do put in a lot of time into the movie. I know you're thinking "what would kids do with that money?" and I guess it's true. But still, they should get paid the amount they deserve. Where I live, you wouldn't even be able to buy a house. Well, maybe like 1/4 of a house. It is a lot of money, but it's not somethign you can live on for the rest of your lives.

It is true that yes they are supporting roles but when you do look at the difference in figures it is quite dramatic, more than 2 million dollars between them and I dont think that is fair. And about Emma's talent, she is a great talent and she is not bad at all. She is perfect for the role and deserved I rekon.

Alright I don't think some of you understand why I posted this in the first place. I understand Emma and Rupert play supporting roles. I know all ab out movies and who gets what and why they get so little if they're role isn't that big. I'm a film student. The reason why I posted this is because I was a little outraged that Dan was up in the millions for the third film and Rupert and Emma's never budged an inch from the first film. Warner Brother's are complete morons if theyt hink those two are going to work for practically peanuts. $125,000 is like chump change in Hollywood. If Warner Brother's doesn't want to pay Emma and Rupert at least a million thats fine. But at least bump these poor kids salaries up to at least $500,000 or more.