Latest Site Notices

katiebell · #1 (**permalink**) 02-06-2007, 04:14 PM

In this interview, Equus producer David Pugh explains why play organizers decided to release revealing photographs of Dan Radcliffe, discusses the first week of rehearsals and states he “hope(s) to God it works out.” In addition, the article quotes Warner Brothers as being “utterly dismayed” by the recent ‘Equus’ photoshoot due to Harry Potter branding and image issues.

According to Pugh:

Quote:

This is a boy who is now making his own decisions and rather than just being seen as a sort of Shirley Temple, he is determined that he wants to act for the rest of his life, and this is his way of putting himself out there.

We needed to show that he can play these sorts of parts, and that's why we deliberately put out the photoshoot: because we want people to know they are going to come to see a show about a young man, not a young boy.

I hope to God it works out, because he has been very courageous taking this role on. He never said he wouldn't do it nude, because he knew the scenes were part of the play.

He had to get his kit off with a very beautiful young girl. Quite frankly, I'd have been scared witless, too.

He was shy and hesitant at first, but we decided to throw him straight into those scenes at the end of the first week of rehearsals.

There were just five people in the room at first, but once he and Joanna had done them a few times, they were happy for the whole company to be around.

It certainly is not the case of a quick flash. He's on the stage in the buff for a long time. His parents are in the business and they are backing him totally.

In addition to interviewing Pugh, the article goes on to say that Warner Brothers is "utterly dismayed" by the recently released photographs and the disclosure that Dan will haven a 10-minute nude scene in the play.

Quote:

Warner Bros have been building up their publicity machine for Harry's first - chaste - screen kiss when the next Potter film comes out in the summer. Now our star is out there doing full-frontal sex. We've been blown completely out of the water by this.

At this stage, with two films still to be made, Daniel is still signed to star in them, but the company will have to watch the reaction of the public when this play begins.

The truth is that it would be very hard to recast, because Daniel is so famous in the role and is adored by the fans. But if his new image is seen to be at odds with the franchise, then the whole issue would have to be looked at.

I guess we always knew that Harry and Daniel would have to grow up, but we hadn't bargained on full-frontal sex scenes.

We have no confirmation from Warner Brothers on the accuracy of these quotes at this time.

**starlightangel** · 02-06-2007, 04:31 PM

I really hope they don't have to re-cast. I think they're over reacting to something that probably won't have much impact on his image. The sad thing is, he always will be 'Harry Potter'. Its the main thing he'll be remembered for. Just because he's doing a 10 min nude scene, does not mean that he's going to be blowing the whole HP image.

They seem to forget it's an entirely different character he's playing too. Harry's first kiss, and whats his face, (Alan?)'s first time i think.

nicola calvert · 02-06-2007, 04:47 PM

Well, i think this is goig a bit far, Dan has a right to do what he wants, and just because he plays harry it doesn't mean that Equus will spoil Harry's first kiss! Most fans of the films don't even know that he will be staring in Equus, and even if they do they should know that Dan is an actor and playing different roles is a part of that.
Nicola

Dumbledore · 02-06-2007, 04:54 PM

They won't recast. There is no way they would even try.

I am sure they are only preparing him for possible contract "renegotiations" in case they think his tainted image (if there is one) would harm the box-office potential for the future films.

BrigetteAlisia · 02-06-2007, 04:57 PM

OMG....how could they even consider recasting???? this is an outrage.......Daniel can do both roles and if people cant understand that they are completely seperate then those people need to get some help.......

GinnyWeasley07 · 02-06-2007, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starlightangel

I really hope they don't have to re-cast. I think they're over reacting to something that probably won't have much impact on his image. The sad thing is, he always will be 'Harry Potter'. Its the main thing he'll be remembered for. Just because he's doing a 10 min nude scene, does not mean that he's going to be blowing the whole HP image.

They seem to forget it's an entirely different character he's playing too. Harry's first kiss, and whats his face, (Alan?)'s first time i think.

I totally agree! They can't recast-they'd have too many upset fans!

padfoot_88 · 02-06-2007, 05:04 PM

Some people need to grow up and get over it, from the sounds of things. Yes, Dan has been Harry Potter for a long time now, and seen as an innocent boy who can do no wrong...but Dan has been growing up, as has Harry, and just because Harry has only just started to notice girls and is having his first kiss, doesn't mean Dan is the same. Also, being at the age he is, with the way his career is going, he will be wanting to get out and try different things, do more to add to his acting resume. The more experience he has, the more parts he'll be asked to do, which means we'll see him more on our screens and stages.
Yes, it will be a little strange to see Harry Potter as someone else, let alone nude, but it will be an uplifting and eye-opening experience, for both the fans and Dan himself. I personally can't wait to see the play, as I believe Dan has amazing natural acting talent. It will be an honour and priveledge to see him in such a highly regarded play.
Recasting will only stir up trouble, possibly causing Dan to feel guilty about doing the play and destroying his place in Harry Potter. And fans wouldn't be too happy about it either.

NightShadows · 02-06-2007, 05:08 PM

*frowns* Who really cares about the fact that Dan is doing full-frontal sex scenes? Big deal. It's the fans who matter, and the Potter fans KNOW Dan is 17 years old, and that he's growing up into a young man. (A gorgeous one at that.) But still, most fans aren't going to care. And frankly, I don't care if Dan is doing other things with his life. More power to him, I say!

OtterySt.Catchpole · 02-06-2007, 05:08 PM

Oh please, the WB is eating this up ...

if Ootp doesn't make more money than all the other movies combined I'll change my username to FullaPoo

sounds funny I might change it neways

Okay kids let's save OOtp, remember to tell all your friends Harry comes out naked in Ootp (yes I know it's a blatant lie your point?) so we can get them to the theaters in droves ... because the WB doesn't know their audience is mainly adolescent hormonal and utterly devoid of self-restraint *realizes why we need mods* OMG! I'll never talk smack about the Mods again ...

maybe ...

Hollister · 02-06-2007, 05:11 PM

Dan is and probobly always will be the face of Harry Potter but he's an actor, it's his job to play different roles in other things. And it's not going to 'ruin' Harry's first kiss because it's Harry's first kiss not Dan's (it might be

) Let him do other play's and films! But yeah, little kids will notice him in the streets and call him Harry.

**lightstar1154** · 02-06-2007, 05:14 PM

Ug ewwww. WB is being stupid. *thwacks them*

People make such a big deal out of things. He's not doing porn... he's doing a play with nudity... where nudity is key to the play. That DOESN'T effect his ability to play Harry and to play him well, nor does it show anything but the fact that Daniel isn't an actor who should have to spend the res tof his life as Harry Potter and Harry only.

If WB wants to keep the HP movies good, they won't recast.

02-06-2007, 05:26 PM

I think they should just get over it. If Dan wants to go out and be in a different play, let him. If the parents don't want the kids seeing it, don't let them. Harry Potter was a start for him, and I support him in his journey through acting, and those shots arn't bad either

barabas black · 02-06-2007, 05:27 PM

I think that people look at dan as a role model, but He is an actor too. He is of legal age, so I think he can do what he wants. as long as the sex scenes dont interfer with harry potter, I dont care.

Mrs Felton · 02-06-2007, 05:32 PM

I don't think WB will recast unless they're prepared for complete uproar. And anyway, Dan going nude isn't the end of the world, or HP.

hermia123 · 02-06-2007, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrs Felton

I don't think WB will recast unless they're prepared for complete uproar. And anyway, Dan going nude isn't the end of the world, or HP.

Agreed with that. There would be a BIG uproar and it's not the end of the world. he has the right to do what HE wants!

~*MischaBloom*~ · 02-06-2007, 06:30 PM

This is just absolutely ridiculous! Why are they making such a flippin' big deal out of this? Dan has a right to make his own choices; it's his life and his career. You know it's hard for Dan, because he's always going to be known as 'Harry Potter' and thats whats sad. People don't seem to get that he's an actor. It was just today that I read an article in newsweek about this play and his scenes being nude; I got so mad. They were saying that how the parents doesn't approve of this and all that bs. I'm like-first of all your not his parents! *me yelling at the magazine* If there was a problem concerning this with his parents, I'm sure Dan wouldn't have done it. The dude is like 17! he's not a kid anymore! But alot of people will see him as that from Harry Potter. I just really hate that they're taking this too serious and all with the recasting stuff. I tell you, if they do replace Dan then my God the fans will go crazy.

StepsMadClare · 02-06-2007, 06:31 PM

If Dan wants to do full-frontal nude it's his choice isn;t it? WB won't re-cast cause of that. he's nearly 18 old enough to make his own choices is he not?

MizFit_of_Society · 02-06-2007, 06:36 PM

Why are they even thinking of re-casting?!

I'm sure that many fans won't appeal to the new actor. Besides the other actors will have to get along with someone totally new.

Padie · 02-06-2007, 06:43 PM

Re-cast Harry? I'd like to see them try, alright. Dan has the right to do whatever he wants to in the acting business. If he wants to do nude scenes let him do those! What on Earth has Harry Potter got to do with Equus? For God's sake, Warner Bros is treating this whole issue like if it was the worst thing on Earth when it isn't, really *sigh* I hope they don't forget that if they replace Daniel, about half of the people who watch the films won't do it anymore... I don't even know if I would.

Simple_Spells · 02-06-2007, 06:50 PM

Sure, some people might feel weird watching Dan play Harry after seeing those scenes. But even MORE people wouldn't like them recasting.

.Pillow.Fighter. · 02-06-2007, 07:05 PM

That's interesting... but I don't think it should matter what Dan does. I mean, it's his decision... and it's just acting. Who really cares?

midnightdanzer · 02-06-2007, 07:48 PM

More people would probably react if they decided to recast rather than the fact that he is doing sex scenes somwhere else. It is utterly and completely his choice to do whatever he wants and they shouldn't take away HP from him just because he decided to do other things.