|      | |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| 
08-21-2005, 06:51 AM
| | |  David Heyman on the GoF PG-13 rating
Entertainment Weekly has a new quote from WB and David Heyman discussing the PG-13 rating that ' Goblet of Fire' has received in the US.
"Kids. One moment they're frolicking under the Whomping Willow, and next thing you know they're like, thinking about making out 'n' stuff. Yes, the Harry Potter franchise became a man recently when the MPAA smacked the fourth flim, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (due November 18), with a very grown-up PG-13 rating."
"We anticipated at some point this was going to happen," says Dawn Taubin, President of Marketing for Warner Bros. Pictures. "It was just a question of when." Although the rating - the MPAA is concerned about "sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images" - may lop a serious portion of the audience off at this 6-year-old knees, Producer David Heyman is unfazed. "Kids loathe to be patronized," he says. "The most important thing for us is to maintain the fidelity to the material. [It's] a little frightening at times, but that's the book."
"(What's so scary, exactly? Try the murder of a Hogwarts student and the rebirth of You-Know-Who.) Parents might flinch a bit, but the PG-13 certainly didn't hurt the latest Star Wars outing, another all-ages title, or either Spider-Man film. Only, hold up: In the wake of the painfully tragic sixth book, Half-Blood Prince...goodness, does R-rated territory lie ahead? "I don't think we'll ever get there," Taubin says with a laugh. "One movie at a time."
EW have also rated GoF as their number 1 anticipated fall movie.
Source: VTM  | |
08-21-2005, 06:57 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Demiguise
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Weasley's Wizard Wheezes
Posts: 5,421
|
First to post!!!!!!!!! Awesome..
Wow a PG-13 rating, I could of seen that coming. It doesnt matter what rating it gets, its still going to make alot of money. I cant wait till GoF, its going to be awesome.
__________________ 
Chaser of the Slytherin Quidditch Team
thanks to falling from grace | 
| | |
08-21-2005, 07:02 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Poltergeist
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 17,097
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated | Kaplinski Rival Sorting Hat Machine
We already knew the rating  this is just their comments on it.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 07:16 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| 
Resident Movie CriticBasilisk
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: ginger beard™
Posts: 47,434
| Seelow ✖ Jackal ✖ Brain Boss ✖ Perky! ✖ Dirty Flow
Haha nice article. HBP probably won't get stuck with the R rating. I don't think it will...anyway even though the movie's got that rating, parents are STILL gonna take their little 6 year olds to see the movie. | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 07:16 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| 
SS Slogan Winner
Ginny's Name SharerHippogriff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,430
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Naya Holmes
Fifth Year |
Thanks for posting that Emma
__________________  | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 07:54 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Poltergeist
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 17,097
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated | Kaplinski Rival Sorting Hat Machine
I think the '6 year old' bit is referring to the movie franchise which you could say started in 1999 when casting began for PS. It'd make sense that way because they talk about it losing an audience. Which they won't as David said.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 08:07 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| *is bored* Bicorn
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Orlando Blooms bedroom...mwahahhh
Posts: 1,989
|
I think that it wouldnt make that much of a differnce, ok think of it like this when the 1st movie came out, mostly kids like 10 or 11 or something went to go see it...now the 4th movie is coming out and those kids who were 10 or 11 are now like wht 14 or 15 or older...so mainly the point here is that the people who are goin to see the movie are mostly goin to be teenagers and adults, cuz they grew up with the book..as harry potter gets older, so do the readers...  does that make any sense? well it does in my head lmao
luv always,
~SYLVIA~
P.S. sry im not good at explaining things  if u need me to explain better, i'd gladly try...
Last edited by sweetbaby; 08-21-2005 at 08:10 AM.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 08:15 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Bundimun
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: A nice house in a muggle area.
Posts: 31
|
I personally dont think it is going to effect who sees the movie.
I know if i was under 13 I would'nt think twice about going to see it.
And considering its Harry Potter, I don't think most parents will have an issue with it.
But then again thats just me.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 08:55 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Bicorn
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: JAPAN i want to!
Posts: 1,828
Sixth Year |
Finally they have rated it! 13 soo i guess we will be expecting more?
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 08:57 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Puffskein
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Pearl City HI
Posts: 171
|
Hey...at least i will be able to see it...that means it will be a little more edgy.lol : )
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 09:10 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Dugbog
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Behind you!
Posts: 657
|
But I still think it (the PG-13 rating) would hurt the box office returns.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone; and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets was able to enter the Top 10 of the All-Time Box Office Movie Chart, Worldwide (where Titanic holds the top spot, and Lord of the Rings: Return of the King is 2nd) -- because of the all-ages rating.
Children have a big draw in the box office, and I'm afraid that this rating will lessen the chances of the GoF movie to make it to the Top 10 of that list.
Last edited by wheezy's gal; 08-21-2005 at 09:13 AM.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 09:14 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Bicorn
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Cumbria,Uk
Posts: 1,755
|
The 6 year olds have grown up and the 10 year old and 15 and 18 and 20 etc. Harry is for everyone. anyways wot is it going to get in the UK I think it will be a 12a for Peter Pettigrew and stuff. -Helen 
__________________
"I NEVER GOT MY HOGWARTS LETTER SO I'M MOVING TO FOLKS W.A!"
"AND SO THE LION FELL IN LOVE WITH THE LAMB"
"AND SO THE VAMPIRE,RODE INTO TOWN IN A SILVER VOLVO AND RESCUSED ME!" | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 09:21 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Poltergeist
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 17,097
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated | Kaplinski Rival Sorting Hat Machine
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheezy's gal But I still think it (the PG-13 rating) would hurt the box office returns.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone; and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets was able to enter the Top 10 of the All-Time Box Office Movie Chart, Worldwide (where Titanic holds the top spot, and Lord of the Rings: Return of the King is 2nd) -- because of the all-ages rating.
Children have a big draw in the box office, and I'm afraid that this rating will lessen the chances of the GoF movie to make it to the Top 10 of that list. That's funny because here LotR and Titance got 12A/12 certificates -- the UK equivalent of a PG-13 and they still did well. As David said, pretty much, the text dictates the film to an extent and so it had to be an issue of when and not if HP would ever get a higher classification.
And we all know box office ratings aren't everything. All it means is that loads of people see the film. Just because loads go doesn't mean they all liked it and it definitely doesn't mean it's a good quality film. Quote:
anyways wot is it going to get in the UK I think it will be a 12a for Peter Pettigrew and stuff.
We don't know for certain. I think psosibly a 12A but PG's have been getting away with a lot more lately so ... it's anyone's guess.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 09:38 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Gnome
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: outer space or ... no i dont no
Posts: 70
|
I knew that it would b a PG - 13 COZ ITS DARKER THAN THE REST !!!
CANT WAIT TO WATCH IT !
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 09:41 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Bicorn
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Cumbria,Uk
Posts: 1,755
|
Quote:
We don't know for certain. I think psosibly a 12A but PG's have been getting away with a lot more lately so ... it's anyone's guess.
Yeah I guess but from the sounds of it they said Wowmtail hand thing is pretty bad. -Helen 
__________________
"I NEVER GOT MY HOGWARTS LETTER SO I'M MOVING TO FOLKS W.A!"
"AND SO THE LION FELL IN LOVE WITH THE LAMB"
"AND SO THE VAMPIRE,RODE INTO TOWN IN A SILVER VOLVO AND RESCUSED ME!" | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 10:24 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Phoenix
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: In the TARDIS
Posts: 15,350
|
At least this means it's probably gonna stay true to the book.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 11:34 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Dragon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,807
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Tyler Perkins
First Year | Farmer Carter | | Ama's Secret
As long as i can see it i will be happy  | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 11:54 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Erumpent
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13,474
| Ultimate Potterite Original original
PG-13 
Well, the books have grown up as they go, and so will the movies. Actually, I can say I'm extremely pleased with the rating because it shows that the books aren't so "kiddish" anymore.
Now let's hope that it will stay 95% (or more) true to the book! | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 12:06 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|  
SS Featured WriterDemiguise
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Storybrooke
Posts: 5,129
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Adam Fitzgerald
Seventh Year
Ministry RPG Name:
Violet Becker
Accidents & Catastrophes | "It's not who you are that holds you back, it's who you think you are not."
I figured this one would be rated PG-13. Especially after people thought that the third one should be rated PG-13. Well the third was scarier than the second anyhow. But I mean it makes sense. The whole ending scene is a great reason to make it PG-13 as well as the tasks. I mean the Merpeople from the second task might be scary looking to a six year old. I still think they'll have a lot of people going to see it still though
__________________  | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 12:15 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Occamy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 28,872
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Professor McFarlane
Graduated | IndyEddie
PG-13? Nah, no audience will be lost with that one, unless the parents are the, "Only G Rated Flims for us" kind, which is doubtful, or if they dont want to expose their younger children (siblings of the older HP fans) so death quite yet.
Will it affect a majority of people? No. Will some people not go see it because of the rating? Yes. All in all will it ruin HP? Yeah, right. And the moon is made of cheese.
__________________ 
We'll always be together cuz we're both under the moon | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 12:23 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
| Fear My Pixie StixsTeh Book Police Plimpy
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: They like to call it Malta.
Posts: 1,103
|
I think they'll either give it a PG or 12 rating over here.
I think PG-13 is the farthest they will go as regards to rating for the HP movies, even when they come to HBP. It would be ridiculous to do it like 16 or something(sorry not sure what foreign ratings are exactly) and it would bring a big dent in the money-intake as many children watch the HP movies.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 12:40 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Demiguise
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Mtns of E. TN
Posts: 5,373
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Remus James Lupin (RJ)
Second Year | Gryfflepuff
I expected a P-13 rating considering the material in GoF. All the tasks of the Triwizard coupled with the graveyard scene. It was just a matter of time before it happened. I am sort of glad because that means the movie will be as exciting as the book. It won't be watered down. We get to feel the excitement goind into each task and at the grave yard. I can't wait. The only question now is when do I go see it....Opening day or later?
__________________  | |
| | |
08-21-2005, 12:46 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
| | Leprechaun
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Fangtasia.
Posts: 17,754
Hogwarts RPG Name:
Teagan Skye Corliss
Fifth Year | Chris Cookie Siriusly In Love
It's about time... and, well, there'd be no rightful way to make the happenings in 4 seem less than pg 13, anyway..
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 01:06 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Flobberworm
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Newcastle, England.
Posts: 19
|
Not many people who've read the book could say they didn't expect this. Even the Prisoner of Azkaban's dementors caused a few questions to be asked about the final rating.
| |
| | |
08-21-2005, 01:50 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Bundimun
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: In Harry Potter Land!
Posts: 32
|
I knew it would happen sooner or l8er and found out the morning it waz announced.. *tear,* *tear,* I DONT CARE though I CANT LIVE WITHOUT HARRY POTTER!!
Harry is Love.... 
Harry Loves Luna
Harry Loves ME!!   | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
| | | All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 AM. |
