sitemap
Visit The Official WB Shop!

Members

Members in Chat:
BertieBot, Gildebot_LockHart


If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

  Register Rules and FAQ Search
Go Back   SnitchSeeker.com > Forums > Daily Prophet > Harry Potter News
Harry Potter News Latest news and rumors about the Harry Potter world!

Vote for SS!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2003, 08:53 PM
EmmaRiddle EmmaRiddle is offline
 
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

* Chris Columbus Slammed - Criticism of Potter Film

Summary:
Brit directors criticse Americanisation of Potter

Article:

PARKER SLAMS POTTER

British director SIR ALAN PARKER has slammed American movie maker CHRIS COLUMBUS for making the first HARRY POTTER film "terrible".

The EVITA film-maker claims Columbus' HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE is too "Americanised", and maintains both he and fellow Brit TERRY GILLIAM would have made a better effort of author JK ROWLING's magical franchise.

He says, "It was terrible. Absolutely awful. I would have made it so much better than Chris Columbus."

Sir Alan was reportedly considered to take on the franchise before it was handed to the HOME ALONE director - but Parker is convinced he would have never been offered the challenge.

He says, "I like to have creative control and do things my way. It was Americanised. The finance was coming from BURGER KING. They wanted it a certain way.

"Terry Gilliam would have made a better film than me."

29/10/2003 14:06

thanks to Contactmusic
Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 08:59 PM   #2 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

I think it was americanised slightly so I can sympathise with this guy.
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
seanlover11111
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't believe this guy!! the HP films were great, and i don't think they were americanized at all. It's people like this. . . :ermsmile: >
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gryffindor
*randomly tagged*
Faerie
 
Krel Ansell's Avatar
 
Location: Drowning in files
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,854

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Agatha DeWitt
Sixth Year
Send a message via AIM to Krel Ansell Send a message via Yahoo to Krel Ansell
Default

I thought Columbus did a good job. He's just jealous that he didn't get picked to direct the movie that’s all.
Krel Ansell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:41 PM   #5 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

Well PS was patronising towards other fans, it was made in too much of a childish mannner...
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:48 PM   #6 (permalink)
Admin
Faerie
 
Location: Norway
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,810
Send a message via AIM to Dumbledore Send a message via MSN to Dumbledore
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Marcella_Riddle@Oct 29 2003, 09:44 PM
I think it was americanised slightly so I can sympathise with this guy.
I'm with you.

The movies were very much Americanized, and absolutely in the "Hollywood" spirit of doing things, rather than the way many of us imagined it to be in our heads from Jo's very descriptive writing.

I think the whole look and feel would have likely been very different if directed by a European director. I look greatly forward to Cuarón's contribution in Prisoner of Azkaban. Should (hopefully) be a vast improvement over the (imo) overly-sentimental methods of Chris Columbus.

The guys is a fine fellow and certainly good in his own right, but imo (in my opinion) doesn't capture the essence of Jo's magical world the way it should have been.

I mean, it's a bit too "glossy" and "perfect" if you know what I mean. :unsure:
Dumbledore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:49 PM   #7 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dumbledore+Oct 29 2003, 09:33 PM-->
QUOTE (Dumbledore @ Oct 29 2003, 09:33 PM)
I'm with you.

The movies were very much Americanized, and absolutely in the "Hollywood" spirit of doing things, rather than the way many of us imagined it to be in our heads from Jo's very descriptive writing.

I think the whole look and feel would have likely been very different if directed by a European director. I look greatly forward to Cuarón's contribution in Prisoner of Azkaban. Should (hopefully) be a vast improvement over the (imo) overly-sentimental methods of Chris Columbus.

The guys is a fine fellow and certainly good in his own right, but imo (in my opinion) doesn't capture the essence of Jo's magical world the way it should have been.

I mean, it's a bit too "glossy" and "perfect" if you know what I mean. :unsure: [/b][/quote]
Yes! Which is why I think British Director Mike Newell who is scheduled to do GoF will do the books justice! He can probably truly appreciate maybe more than other directors the necessity of detailed attention with the books.
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 09:59 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gryffindor
 
EmMa_WaTsOn89's Avatar
 
Location: tampa, florida
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,341
Send a message via AIM to EmMa_WaTsOn89 Send a message via Yahoo to EmMa_WaTsOn89
Default

it was sorta americanized i didnt think the first 1 was bad actually i thought the harry potter1 was better then harry potter2 i dont know y i just thought so. that was mean of Alan Parker to say that
EmMa_WaTsOn89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:11 PM   #9 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by EmMa_WaTsOn89@Oct 29 2003, 09:44 PM
it was sorta americanized i didnt think the first 1 was bad actually i thought the harry potter1 was better then harry potter2 i dont know y i just thought so. that was mean of Alan Parker to say that
I can see your point but perhaps he maybe working alongside Mike Newell on GoF and wishes to prove that the British Directors could do a better job. who knows really.
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 635
Send a message via AIM to Professor Moony
Default

I thought that COS was better than PS/SS, it was darker, but that's just the nature of that particular book. I do think that SS/ PS was a bit childish, but I wouldnt say americanized. I do believe that Alfonso will do a better job with the movie. He seems to be a bit more mature with his work. I look forward to seeing the film!
Professor Moony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:13 PM   #11 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Professor Moony@Oct 29 2003, 09:56 PM
I thought that COS was better than PS/SS, it was darker, but that's just the nature of that particular book. I do think that SS/ PS was a bit childish, but I wouldnt say americanized. I do believe that Alfonso will do a better job with the movie. He seems to be a bit more mature with his work. I look forward to seeing the film!
He does, I absoutley loved 'The Little Princess' so I am looking forward to his perception of Harry Potter.
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:17 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Chizpurfle
 
HP_Gem54's Avatar
 
Location: In a castle far far away...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 744
Default

Ok I think it was slightly americanized BUT I don't think it was awful. Sure it was directed be Chris Columbus to appeal to the 6 and up group, but that guy is being ,in my oppinion, a little harsh. But hey he has the right to his own opinion.
HP_Gem54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:19 PM   #13 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

Quote:
appeal to the 6 and up group
That is not the Harry Potter age group though. Real fans have read the books. So I'd say the proper range by now (how old the kids are now) would be 11+
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:20 PM   #14 (permalink)
Hufflepuff
 
ShellyV929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,507
Default

Well, I liked SS/PS, it was a nice movie, but so many important details were left out of it. I didn't particularlt like CoS, because it didn't seem to get me as emotionally involved. This may be because it is a "hollywood" style movie, but I see very few movies that are not from America, so I really wouldn't know. It should be interesting to see how PoA does, and I hope it is done justice, as this is my favorite book.
ShellyV929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 635
Send a message via AIM to Professor Moony
Default

It should be interesting to see how PoA does, and I hope it is done justice, as this is my favorite book. (ShellyV929)

Yeah, I can't wait to see how GOF comes out! That was my favorite one!
Professor Moony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:31 PM   #16 (permalink)
Slytherin
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 325
Default

their being a (i would say it but i think it is inappropreate). i dont care i think it is fine. but it is just a little
hpfreak03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:32 PM   #17 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Chizpurfle
 
HP_Gem54's Avatar
 
Location: In a castle far far away...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 744
Default

Quote:
Marcella_Riddle Posted on Oct 29 2003, 06:04 PM
  QUOTE 
appeal to the 6 and up group



That is not the Harry Potter age group though. Real fans have read the books. So I'd say the proper range by now (how old the kids are now) would be 11+
I know. I just think that the movies were made for a much younger audience than they should have been and younger than the books are.
HP_Gem54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:32 PM   #18 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

That is exactly what I and the critics were implying.
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:34 PM   #19 (permalink)
Slytherin
 
Location: Britain
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 435
Default

Quote:
Well, I liked SS/PS, it was a nice movie, but so many important details were left out of it.
I agree with and the american thing. It not american its a birtish and should mad in the good new britsh style. I enjoyed the movies and love watching them but the fact is well how can i put it any better than how Jack Sparrow would say it "were's the rum"
sunstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:37 PM   #20 (permalink)

Kaplinski Rival
NOT Strange or Evil
Inspirational
Shrake
 
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,657

Hogwarts RPG Name:
Marcella Riddle
Graduated
Send a message via MSN to EmmaRiddle
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sunstar@Oct 29 2003, 10:19 PM
Quote:
Well, I liked SS/PS, it was a nice movie, but so many important details were left out of it.
I agree with and the american thing. It not american its a birtish and should mad in the good new britsh style. I enjoyed the movies and love watching them but the fact is well how can i put it any better than how Jack Sparrow would say it "were's the rum"
Where's that edge that makes it british, that leaves a mark of it being a british film? I think that's what you mean. People may mistake it for American, when it's not.
EmmaRiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:39 PM   #21 (permalink)
Gryffindor
Chizpurfle
 
HP_Gem54's Avatar
 
Location: In a castle far far away...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 744
Default

Quote:
Marcella_Riddle Posted on Oct 29 2003, 06:17 PM
  That is exactly what I and the critics were implying.
Oh. Ok. opps.
HP_Gem54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 10:58 PM   #22 (permalink)
Ravenclaw
 
Gryffidor Student's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 336
Default

we only can compare if the third movie is out to see who is best. i can't wait to see it.
Gryffidor Student is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2003, 11:57 PM   #23 (permalink)
Slytherin
 
Location: Greece (i wish)... Texas, USA
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 271
Send a message via AIM to Greek_SlytherinChic
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dumbledore+Oct 29 2003, 04:33 PM-->
QUOTE (Dumbledore @ Oct 29 2003, 04:33 PM)
I'm with you.

The movies were very much Americanized, and absolutely in the "Hollywood" spirit of doing things, rather than the way many of us imagined it to be in our heads from Jo's very descriptive writing.

I think the whole look and feel would have likely been very different if directed by a European director. I look greatly forward to Cuarón's contribution in Prisoner of Azkaban. Should (hopefully) be a vast improvement over the (imo) overly-sentimental methods of Chris Columbus.

The guys is a fine fellow and certainly good in his own right, but imo (in my opinion) doesn't capture the essence of Jo's magical world the way it should have been.

I mean, it's a bit too "glossy" and "perfect" if you know what I mean. :unsure: [/b][/quote]
Hey i know it was a little childish and all, but really do we have to be racist about it?? "It was too americanized" what does that mean?? I hate racists and people who stereotype. It was childish because it was a CHILD'S movie. I know it could be better, but at least it wasn't all ghetto and all.
Greek_SlytherinChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2003, 12:11 AM   #24 (permalink)
Luz
Slytherin
 
Luz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 714
Default

I don't think the movies were americanized. How could they be?, with a whole british cast, filmed in scotland was it?. No i disagree with this person. I haven't seen any movies directed by Alan Parker so i can't say if he would have good or bad for the Potter movies.
The movies were very cute, i think, but the first two books are the lighter books on the series. Actually i think Columbus did a great job with CoS, and PS was very good too. The movies were cute, anyone knows Columbus makes cute movies, but i don't think he americanized them.
Luz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2003, 12:15 AM   #25 (permalink)
Luz
Slytherin
 
Luz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Greek_SlytherinChic@Oct 29 2003, 06:42 PM
Hey i know it was a little childish and all, but really do we have to be racist about it?? "It was too americanized" what does that mean?? I hate racists and people who stereotype. It was childish because it was a CHILD'S movie. I know it could be better, but at least it wasn't all ghetto and all.
I thought i had been the only one who had felt it. It sounds a bit racist doesn't it?. Oh yeah, "the movies are trash cause they weren't directed by an european", so what are directors from other continents? good for nothing?, it's been the same with Cuaron a lot of people are expecting the worst of him, and some of them use as an excuse that he is mexican.
Luz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 PM.


This Harry Potter fans website is not endorsed by Hogwarts, Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling, Warner Bros, Dan Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Quidditch, Wizards, Muggles, Video Games, X-Box, Half-Blood Princes, Orders of the Phoenix, Goblets of Fire, Philosophers Stones, Chambers of Secret, DVD's or any other official Harry Potter source.

All content is copyright ©2002 - 2006, SnitchSeeker.com unless stated otherwise.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.1 © 2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Site designed by Richard Harris Design