I did not Picture Fleur to look the way she looks in the movie does anyone else feel this way?

Well we've only seen pictures of her during the tasks. Her appearance during the Triwizard Tournament is a bit more practical. I'm sure she'll look every bit as stunning in the Yule Ball and other scenes, that don't have her about to tackle a dragon or a grindylow.

your right!
at least she's blonde!
cant wait to see her looks during the Yule Ball.

I agree with you. In the pictures she doesn't look at all as I imagined, though she may look prettier at the Yule Ball or at the moments not during the tasks... I think we'll see her in the theatrical trailer, so I'll leave my decision till then

The actress is far away from the description Rowling gave Fleur in the novels..The actress wasn't that beauty that Fleur should be..The same way with Cho

Yes that it very true. Although Fleur may be somewhat pretty, I always pictured her to stunningly beautiful. I don't know how pretty they'd make the veela though. I'll just have to see if she gives justice in the films to Fleur.

I completely agree Alex. You can't pass judgements on a handful of pictures taken during tasks. Of course she won't be stunning then; people need to remember long hair is impractical for running, swimming, fighting a dragon etc ...

Obviously WB want to keep her Yule Ball thing a secret so when we see her it'll be WOW. Though I'm unsure as to why they showed Hermione so early on in the build-up.

Still, even in the tasks shots (especially the hi-res ones) it's quite evident that Clemence is stunningly beautiful.

I think Clemence is a fab choice as Fleur. I see nothing wrong with the way she or Katie Leung looks.

I saw a pic for the actress who is playing Fleur apart from HP and also she wasn't fit the discription of Rowling. Just look at her face, I don't think the face will change when she is in a Yule ball or in a task..May be her hair..he clothes.. No, Fleur is more beauty than her..

Well of course because in that film she wasn't Fleur. I'd like to know what some people see as beauty because to me it's indefinible.

^I agree. Perhaps they are going by the glamour magazine definition of beauty. Even though I said that Fleur was in her Triwizard garb that didn't mean I thought she wasn't attractive. Far from it. When I saw that picture I was about to jump into the screen...that was before Hermione well...that point is. You can't satisfy everyone. That's why there is no one man or woman that everyone finds attractive. It's preference, and I think Clemence is fine.

Apart from the movie, I see the actress her self is beautiful. She is really very nice...but Fleur was more beautiful than her and I want the characters chosen in the movie to be like who in the novels. I know that it could be impossible some times but That's I think every one's wish...I look to the face of the actress.Fleur face is more adorable. That's all. May be the actress could act the role correctly as Fleur and I'll be happy for that but I would be much happy if the look also being fit with what Rowling said. I want the both ( act and lookness )

What would make her more adorable? She's got a great complexion, gorgeous eyes, a discreet slim nose, cute cheekbones and facial structure. I really don't see what else there could be.

Couldn't understand you there, mate.

She is a lucky girl to say all this about her... So, you think there isn't a girl beautiful than her??? I saw many girls that are beautiful than her and look like Fleur.

I don't think you can compare two people because neither are the same. I'd struggle to think of someone prettier than her, who is French. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder though.

I saw some french movies ( of course there was a translation ) and beside, in the Egyptian museum ( which I often go to ) I saw french tourists who were very pretty as I prevent myself to ask her to play the role of Fleur. Of course you have your opinion which I respect and The Beauty, people saw it different . You see this actress fit for Fleur and I don't ..I mean the lookness not the act..I hope she acts the role well.

I think we should see her act before we start judging her

I haven't seen the girl playing Fluer, but things in movies aren't always what we picture

You all shouldn't be judging the girl who is portraying Fleur before you see her act i'm sure shes going to be brilliant as all the cast of Harry Potter are amazing.

Well I haven't seen her picture.. she dosent look as the book describes her???? wonder y they did that?
Well ill jus' have 2 c 4 my self

there's a picture of her (on the left, if you didn't figure it out. ha. ha.)



I didn't really picture her like that, but I didn't picture any of the characters as how they look in the movies. And, i'm not sure that's a good picture to judge by, like Dean_thomas said...
But she's still very pretty, anyhow.

yeah, i agree, i imagined her to be just gorgeous. the one they casted is just pretty to me, but yeah, those were in the tournament. but i don't think she would be my first choice. i hope my opinion will change once i see her in the movie, right now, im not so happy. im sure that she'll be a good actress though, she is experienced isnt she? besides, the casting crew did a good job so far!