Quote:
Originally Posted by
katana
Jamies total involvement with HP is not that big, in terms of time spent on the film. His character is pretty important, and I hope he does the role justice.
It does sound like he's saying Potter is bland and not very exciting, but I think if he had been a character that would have involved him in the Potter films more, he may feel different.
I think it's funny that he says Twilight, cinematically, is young, and there's still a lot of growth for it, but New Moon comes out in a couple of weeks and they're already almost done with Eclipse. The movies are coming out so fast. There's not a lot of room for growth when the book series doesn't give much to work with, IMO.
I agree. He makes Potter sound bland. Or I feel like he doesn't even care about it. Well of course he
does but it just sounds like it's just another thing he's got to do. And I still haven't forgotten his comment about how he thinks HP is more for the younger audience....
As for Twilight, haven't they already wrapped up Eclipse? It's all so fast. Not to compare the two, but I am so glad that Harry Potter is not like that at all. I love how we have/had so much time in between the films (because of course the series wasn't even completed yet for most of the movies). Also, Eclipse is coming out in June right? WOW. They're moving quickly. (Although I don't care anyway. The quicker it's over the better!)
Anyway, I do hope he plays Grindelwald well.