Well, I knew someone was going to write a bad review, considering everyone else is giving it high praise - it's a publicity stunt in my opinion.

I thought Dan did a pretty good job this time around - his emotion scene wasn't great - No Tears... But Emma didn't have them either, so why is she being praised above the others? I think all three of them are great and I love the whole aspect of the movie. Some things were cut out of course they were but it has to be expected.

As for compairing it to LOTR, that is just stupid - because if they made it exactly the same, it would still get a bad review anyway because it would have been "Oh, Cueron copied Jackson" It's a load of ole coldwallop if you ask me! Also LOTR had a bigger budget!

One bad review out of hundreds of great ones is telling us something - this person who reviewed the movie has never picked up a book because they would have gone on to say what was missing, and secondly, if he/she ain't read the books, they they have no bloody idea what they're talking about!

But I give this person credit nonetheless, because its healthy to have critism at the end of the day, but it doesn't mean I have to agree.