Quote:
Originally Posted by Antwone Thomas  The only reason people are against the split is because (A) it has such a long break and (B) they thing WB is trying to get more money out of us but I really don't mind that it's six months apart and I really do believe this is a creative decision and not a way to make more money. I do remember way back when GoF was being considered for a split and I didn't mind it at all. |
That's a pretty hefty assumption. The break is because of post-production and sure they know they will make more money, and after all, that is what the industry is driven toward, but those aren't the reasons why I disagree with the decision. I just think creatively a succinct film could have been realised in one part. I think there are things in
Deathly Hallows that could be let go of. But we shall see.
Quote:
|
I'm just glad that they're including everything.
|
Quote:
|
but good thing DH is gonna be split, that way, no cuts.
|
Again, I really don't think it's gunna work out that way. Which is good, in my book. But, you know, expectations and all that. I think they're being set a wee bit high. Like changing the length is going to solve every 'canon' problem in the movies.
Quote:
|
And personally I'd like to see Chris Columbus come back and direct the last movie, he did such a great job with the first two.
|
David Yates is the director. I think the decision to not take a step backward, was a good one.