SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post

Lilyevans · 08-17-2003, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IrishChaser4Sean@Aug 16 2003, 12:38 PM
According to the August 25th, 2003 People Magazine, Daniel Radcliffe is getting the big pay off

"Big Bucks - and Litte: Daniel Radcliffe, aka Harry Potter, is said the have recieved $3.2 million for Azkaban, up from the $320,000 combined for the first two movies. Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, who play Harry's pals Hermione and Ron, reportedly were paid a mere $125,000 per movie. All three are negotiating to appear in the fourth movie."

Yeah, but they're supporting characters -- think about it: Hermione was barely in the second movie, and Ron was in it a little more, but almost 60% of the scenes were all Daniel, which is a lot for a young actor, and the other 40% were also Daniel, but with Rupert and Emma as well, so they were sharing the limelight. It's not unfair, it's the reality of playing a secondary character.

08-17-2003, 03:12 PM	#3 (permalink)
Lilyevans Chizpurfle Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Vancouver Canada (originally California) Posts: 698	Quote: Originally posted by IrishChaser4Sean@Aug 16 2003, 12:38 PM According to the August 25th, 2003 People Magazine, Daniel Radcliffe is getting the big pay off "Big Bucks - and Litte: Daniel Radcliffe, aka Harry Potter, is said the have recieved $3.2 million for Azkaban, up from the $320,000 combined for the first two movies. Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, who play Harry's pals Hermione and Ron, reportedly were paid a mere $125,000 per movie. All three are negotiating to appear in the fourth movie." Yeah, but they're supporting characters -- think about it: Hermione was barely in the second movie, and Ron was in it a little more, but almost 60% of the scenes were all Daniel, which is a lot for a young actor, and the other 40% were also Daniel, but with Rupert and Emma as well, so they were sharing the limelight. It's not unfair, it's the reality of playing a secondary character. __________________ P to the Otter