They're getting too old to finish the "trilogy"? That would only be 3 movies, which they're almost finished with...wouldn't the Harry Potter movies be a "septology" or something like that if they made all of them? And I think 14 years old can hardly be considered adult, but I guess it does seem a lot older than when they made "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone." And I've heard things about how Dan, Rupert and Emma aren't signed on for sure for "Goblet of Fire" yet, but they'd be about the right ages for that one if it's going to be released in 2005. They have like 20-year-olds playing middle-school students on Disney Channel. I guess I just don't understand why it would be so unbelievable to have a 15-year-old (Dan's age in 2005) playing a 14-year-old...
|