SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post

ToMfeltonzAnGeL · 01-30-2004, 10:26 PM

hmmm....odd proposition...if it was two u dey could make more money AND we'd be able to see the stars more hmmm....dey'd probably leave us in a cliff hanger tho and i HATE to wait...if dey had only one...den it's cheaper for the people who want to see it...it would be kinna full...but der would be less details...i want in two parts...if i could wait for the third movie to come i guess i could wait for the 1st part in nov 15 and the second one in christmas...dat'd be great!! but i hope the DvDs would be sold in one piece instead of two

the movie shouldn't only be 2 1/2 hours long cause HELLO!! lord of the rings had 3 hours!! on ders and like soem people sed titanic had 4!! so why not make the HP movie longer??

01-30-2004, 10:26 PM	#17 (permalink)
ToMfeltonzAnGeL Horklump Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Las Vegas (Sin City...baybee!!) Posts: 68	hmmm....odd proposition...if it was two u dey could make more money AND we'd be able to see the stars more hmmm....dey'd probably leave us in a cliff hanger tho and i HATE to wait...if dey had only one...den it's cheaper for the people who want to see it...it would be kinna full...but der would be less details...i want in two parts...if i could wait for the third movie to come i guess i could wait for the 1st part in nov 15 and the second one in christmas...dat'd be great!! but i hope the DvDs would be sold in one piece instead of two the movie shouldn't only be 2 1/2 hours long cause HELLO!! lord of the rings had 3 hours!! on ders and like soem people sed titanic had 4!! so why not make the HP movie longer??