SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post

She-Who-Is-Not-To-Be-Psycho! · 08-08-2005, 05:11 AM

Oh dear

I made this editorial before HBP, so when I wrote it of course it was without the information in HBP. Thanks guys for finding it interesting, and maybe the theory is not completely dead^^

Now about the trust Dumbledore had for Snape, this is a different issue I barely mentioned in this article. Actually, didn't mention it at all despite the comments I'm getting

All which did indeed read though the long and scary first post, thanks and thanks for your comments^^

But since we are at it... Well, I'm giving Dumbledore more credit than that. I don't think he was fooled by Snape at all, but he knew exactly was was coming and even planned many of it. There's a piece of the puzzle of Severus Snape we don't have, and until we do, we are not allowed, as readers, to make assumptions about how guilty Snape is.

Like with everything else; if you have incomplete information we better keep quiet, and it's obvious Dumbledore had much more information than we or Harry have.

Therefore I'm tempted to think on the same lines of DarthPace, PansyParkinson, etc. Revulsion on his face? Isn't one to mean it, to kill somebody, when you have to use the spell? And about Snape feeding information to Voldemort to hunt the Potters; that had happened before he became a spy, I'm sure.

Again, it's a matter if you trust Dumbledore's judgement, whether you choose to trust Snape or not. Maybe I should write an essay about it next time^^

08-08-2005, 05:11 AM	#24 (permalink)
She-Who-Is-Not-To-Be-Psycho! Reality Police Official -()- Seeker Conspiracy Theorist Phoenix Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: The world's bottom! Posts: 15,601 Hogwarts RPG Name: Currently: Diane Entelequia Second Year	Oh dear I made this editorial before HBP, so when I wrote it of course it was without the information in HBP. Thanks guys for finding it interesting, and maybe the theory is not completely dead^^ Now about the trust Dumbledore had for Snape, this is a different issue I barely mentioned in this article. Actually, didn't mention it at all despite the comments I'm getting All which did indeed read though the long and scary first post, thanks and thanks for your comments^^ But since we are at it... Well, I'm giving Dumbledore more credit than that. I don't think he was fooled by Snape at all, but he knew exactly was was coming and even planned many of it. There's a piece of the puzzle of Severus Snape we don't have, and until we do, we are not allowed, as readers, to make assumptions about how guilty Snape is. Like with everything else; if you have incomplete information we better keep quiet, and it's obvious Dumbledore had much more information than we or Harry have. Therefore I'm tempted to think on the same lines of DarthPace, PansyParkinson, etc. Revulsion on his face? Isn't one to mean it, to kill somebody, when you have to use the spell? And about Snape feeding information to Voldemort to hunt the Potters; that had happened before he became a spy, I'm sure. Again, it's a matter if you trust Dumbledore's judgement, whether you choose to trust Snape or not. Maybe I should write an essay about it next time^^ __________________ Click the siggy piccy to read the adventure... Siggy by Biochemkris for the 3rd Day of Potter Sierra + Lowlow +Julia = Ultimate Nadia Fangirls Last edited by She-Who-Is-Not-To-Be-Psycho!; 08-08-2005 at 05:14 AM.