SnitchSeeker.com - View Single Post

Miss_Potter · 10-18-2003, 05:09 PM

ahhh they better not replace daniel radcliffe! HE IS harry potter! and he can play a year or two younger then he is, actors do that all the time.there is no reason for the casting people to replace daniel, they will hear from me if they do! hermine,ron,harry, the proffesors, they all have to stay. there really aint no reason for them to replace except for death ... poor albus.... RIP

by the way for instance in dawsons creek te actors play 17-18 and they are really 22-23 in real life. its done all over the movie world. so let daniela nd the others beeeee!in all the movies!

I cant wait to see the prizoner of azkaban and the goblet of fire!

Ina Therese aka Miss Potter

10-18-2003, 05:09 PM	#9 (permalink)
Miss_Potter Skrewt Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Trondheim, Norway Posts: 1,313	ahhh they better not replace daniel radcliffe! HE IS harry potter! and he can play a year or two younger then he is, actors do that all the time.there is no reason for the casting people to replace daniel, they will hear from me if they do! hermine,ron,harry, the proffesors, they all have to stay. there really aint no reason for them to replace except for death ... poor albus.... RIP by the way for instance in dawsons creek te actors play 17-18 and they are really 22-23 in real life. its done all over the movie world. so let daniela nd the others beeeee!in all the movies! I cant wait to see the prizoner of azkaban and the goblet of fire! Ina Therese aka Miss Potter